From: Darby Weaver (darbyweaver@yahoo.com)
Date: Mon Jun 18 2007 - 09:47:22 ART
If we all study a little harder, a little more often,
and are a litte more diligent then we probably would
not be "attacked by proctors"...
It seems odd that these guys who seem to me to be
quite the cream de le creme are going to risk their
integrity, career, and reputation to "attack" a CCIE
Candidate.
They are charged with a great reponsibility: The
integrity of the CCIE Lab Program. I doubt any of
them are going to throw it away over a "bad hair day".
And like Scott said, why would they even both you
directly in the first place?
Not sure who you got, but my proctors have been very
professional at RTP and I fully expect that the rest
of the proctors anywhere else in the world maintain
the same level of professionalism.
I did recall asking the person to put a name on the
"proctor" and I do not recall seeing that name.
Let's not attempt to stain the reputation of all
proctors for a lab attempt gone badly. If you have a
name present it, if not, then it is not fair to all
proctors who are working hard to maintain this program
day in and day out to be questioned based on an
informal accusation that has not enough merit to even
formulate a name of a person who is accused of doing
something like what has been proposed.
So back to studying...
I got more NAT to cover... again...
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Jul 01 2007 - 17:24:49 ART