From: tachin saparia (still2find@yahoo.com)
Date: Sun Jun 10 2007 - 05:47:42 ART
Similar thing happened with me also.
For an IOS/IP Features question, all the five commands were missing. And I found out this thing at the last moment. And yes, it is not the "self-induced" thing, cos I configured the commands and saved the configuration twice (actually much more than those number of times, but before reloading saved the configuration twice, again).
At first I also thought it is a bug, but it wasn't. It was a bug in the form of Proctor, that is what i thought. Didn't face this problem in my previous attempt. Now since the second attempt is doomed, wonder what is going to happen the next time.
Regards,
ST
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Abdul Waheed Ghaffar
Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2007 1:31 AM
To: bdennis@internetworkexpert.com; ishelh_mdsa@yahoo.com;
ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Attack by Proctor
Brian,
I like this "you" under quoted :)
Abdul Waheed
CCIE#14010
>It means that "you" created the problems and not the proctor.
>
>Brian Dennis, CCIE4 #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/SP)
>bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
>
>Internetwork Expert, Inc.
>http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
>Toll Free: 877-224-8987
>Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada)
>
>On 6/9/07 9:22 AM, "ismail el-shalh" wrote:
>
Hi Scott,
>
What does "self-induced" means?
>
Ismail El-Shalh :)
MMR/MDSA
>
----- Original Message ----
From: Scott Morris
To: Paul Dardinski ; Yinglam Cheung
; Jinhong Im
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Sent: Saturday, June 9, 2007 7:01:08 PM
Subject: RE: Attack by Proctor
>
Like most of the troubleshooting within the lab, it may have fallen
>under
the category of "self-induced".
>
>
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,
>JNCIE
#153, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
VP - Technical Training - IPexpert, Inc.
IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor
>
A Cisco Learning Partner - We Accept Learning Credits!
>
smorris@ipexpert.com
>
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
http://www.ipexpert.com
>
>
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
>Paul
Dardinski
Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 11:27 AM
To: Yinglam Cheung; Jinhong Im
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Attack by Proctor
>
Hrmm.....don't remember a proctor even having the slightest interest
in
>my
configs during any lab attempt....
>
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
Yinglam Cheung
Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 11:12 AM
To: Jinhong Im
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Attack by Proctor
>
I seldom wrote to the group, but the subject line caught me to take
a
>look.
>
It would be interesting to know why proctor would get on your router
to
check your configurations. AFAIK, proctors don't check candidates'
configs during the testing time. Did you suspect a bug and ask him
to
>check?
I'd have asked proctor why he erased some configs if I were you.
>
In any case you can write to ccie@cisco.com or Cisco Certification
>Support
and I believe you can fill out feedbacks after finishing your lab.
>
Overall I feel proctors in my CCIE lab experience are very
professional.
>
>
regards,
Yinglam
>
----- Original Message ----
From: Jinhong Im
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Sent: Friday, June 8, 2007 4:58:38 AM
Subject: Attack by Proctor
>
>
Hi GS,
>
Today I took my 4th R&S test.
After I checked all my configuration I found the proctor had changed
too
many things, left about 20 minutes.
I really astonished because of too severe attacks by the proctor. He
>blew
out the whole BGP configuration on a switch and so many other
>configurations
I made. I tried to recover all them, but I couldn't have time to
check
>it
again because the proctor was counting time. So I am not sure it all
the
configurations were correct, and finally I found one missing
>configuration
and I couldn't be able to complete it because He was saying time was
>over.
>
I think it is too severe attack to cope.
I would like to know if there is a way to let Cisco know that there
will
>be
few candidates to protect themselves from the attack.
>
Any opinion?
>
Regards
/JH
---------------------------------
Yahoo! oneSearch: Finally, mobile search that gives answers, not web links.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Jul 01 2007 - 17:24:48 ART