From: Digital Yemeni (digital.yemeni@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Jun 18 2007 - 09:50:48 ART
yah very true! :)
I mean think about it,,, if u finish the lab and walked off the room i can
do anything i want to your config! why on earth i would do it in the middle
if my intention is to make you fail the lab?! I personally know and feel
that proctors are HUMAN before being they are Cisco's staff! It would be
VERY cruel to make some one fail just because you feel like it! That person
spent a heck lot of time, money and effort and fly aaaaaaall the way to
you...would you have the heart to just kill him?! damn! that would really be
a painful thing to happen! :(
On 6/18/07, Scott Morris <smorris@ipexpert.com> wrote:
>
> CCIE Ghost Whisperers? ;)
>
> While personally, I would expect the troubleshooting portion to expand a
> bit, the ideas where I see it going have nothing to do with live,
> intermittant, random things being injected. That would be unfair on many
> levels.
>
>
> Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE
> #153, CISSP, et al.
> CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
> VP - Technical Training - IPexpert, Inc.
> IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor
>
> A Cisco Learning Partner - We Accept Learning Credits!
>
> smorris@ipexpert.com
>
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> Fax: +1.810.454.0130
> http://www.ipexpert.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Digital Yemeni
> Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 8:31 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: RE: RE : Attack by Proctor
>
> While it's VERY unreasonable for something like this to happen, the only
> worry is that spreading of these rumors may make them come for real one
> day!! :) I guess some guys are just stressed before even entering the
> lab!!
> ;-) If anyone has this amount of stress before even getting into the real
> thing i would assure you that he/she can see ghosts on the lab booklet as
> well! :)
>
>
>
>
> On 6/18/07, Scott Morris <smorris@ipexpert.com> wrote:
> >
> > While obviously it's hard to track things like that, I'd venture to
> > say there's nothing the proctor has to gain by doing things like that
> > mid-config. If they wanted to make you fail, they could just wait
> > until the end of the exam and change whatever they felt like changing.
> >
> > While troubleshooting IS indeed part of the testing process, it's
> > fairly well spelled out. And from what I remember reading in
> > Maurillio's Ask-the-Expert Q&A session on NetPro, it was specifically
> > mentioned about the problems in startup configs and not ongoing changes
> introduced.
> >
> > Depending on your process of configuration, (e.g. cut 'n' paste) I'd
> > say there's a myriad of possibilities to introduce errors like that
> > all by yourself without any outside intervention.
> >
> > No offense to anyone who mentions this has happened to them, but it's
> > just not plausible. If the proctor had it out for you, in that they
> > wanted you to fail, there are so many other ways to do it without
> > introducing the potential of getting caught that this makes no sense.
> >
> >
> > Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,
> > JNCIE #153, CISSP, et al.
> > CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
> > VP - Technical Training - IPexpert, Inc.
> > IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor
> >
> > A Cisco Learning Partner - We Accept Learning Credits!
> >
> > smorris@ipexpert.com
> >
> > Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> > Fax: +1.810.454.0130
> > http://www.ipexpert.com
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> > Of wjoh71@gmail.com
> > Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 3:55 AM
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Re: RE: RE : Attack by Proctor
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I also had the same problem. 30 minutes before the end of exam in
> > BRUSSELS, I noticed a couple of changes in the routers and switches.
> > For example,
> >
> > 1. network statement (ip address ) under ospf got changed.
> > 2. area 1 nssa kept in the other router though i configured in the
> > right router.
> > 3. additional eigrp process was running in the router.
> >
> > I am not sure whether these are part of exam troubleshooting or these
> > are introduced by the proctors intentionally to make the candidates to
> fail.
> > Could any one comment on this?.
> >
> > thanks,
> > Joh
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > _ Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > _ Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards!
> Digital, CCIE# to be assigned by Cisco when it collects enough $$ out of
> me!
> :p
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
-- Best Regards! Digital, CCIE# to be assigned by Cisco when it collects enough $$ out of me! :p
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Jul 01 2007 - 17:24:49 ART