DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?

From: Bob Sinclair (bsin@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Mar 03 2002 - 16:02:51 GMT-3

• Next message: Raj: "Re: translational bridging driving be nuts!!!"
• Previous message: Peter van Oene: "Re: ISIS Circuit-type vs. IS-type"
• Next in thread: John Mistichelli: "RE: DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?"
• Maybe reply: John Mistichelli: "RE: DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?"
• Maybe reply: Bob Sinclair: "Re: DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?"
• Maybe reply: Manny Gonzalez: "Re: DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?"
• Maybe reply: Jason Sinclair: "RE: DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?"
• Maybe reply: Bob Sinclair: "Re: DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?"
• Maybe reply: Gregg Malcolm: "Re: DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?"
• Maybe reply: John Mistichelli: "RE: DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?"
• Maybe reply: Manny Gonzalez: "Re: DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?"
• Maybe reply: RSiddappa@xxxxxxxxxx: "RE: DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?"
• Maybe reply: John Mistichelli: "RE: DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?"
• Maybe reply: John Mistichelli: "RE: DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?"
• Maybe reply: Bob Sinclair: "Re: DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?"
• Maybe reply: Ahmed Mamoor Amimi: "Re: DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?"
• Maybe reply: Fred Ingham: "Re: DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?"
• Maybe reply: Manny Gonzalez: "Re: DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?"
• Maybe reply: Shadi: "Re: DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?"
• Maybe reply: John Mistichelli: "RE: DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?"
• Maybe reply: Ahmed Mamoor Amimi: "Re: DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?"
• Maybe reply: Bob Sinclair: "Re: DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?"
• Maybe reply: Gregg Malcolm: "Re: DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?"
• Maybe reply: Ahmed Mamoor Amimi: "Re: DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?"
• Maybe reply: Gregg Malcolm: "Re: DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?"
• Maybe reply: DAN DORTON: "Re: DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?"
• Maybe reply: Shadi: "Re: DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
DLSW Gurus,

Is it possible to have a circuit set up between two routers if neither of them
has any remote peer statements? Suppose you have routers A, B and C runnng DLS
W. B has remote peer statements to both A and C. A and C are promiscuous. Ab
solutely no peer statements on A or C. Can a device attached to A connect to a
 device attached to C? Would static resources help?

Thanks. Just Wondering.

• Next message: Raj: "Re: translational bridging driving be nuts!!!"
• Previous message: Peter van Oene: "Re: ISIS Circuit-type vs. IS-type"
• Next in thread: John Mistichelli: "RE: DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?"
• Maybe reply: John Mistichelli: "RE: DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?"
• Maybe reply: Bob Sinclair: "Re: DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?"
• Maybe reply: Manny Gonzalez: "Re: DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?"
• Maybe reply: Jason Sinclair: "RE: DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?"
• Maybe reply: Bob Sinclair: "Re: DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?"
• Maybe reply: Gregg Malcolm: "Re: DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?"
• Maybe reply: John Mistichelli: "RE: DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?"
• Maybe reply: Manny Gonzalez: "Re: DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?"
• Maybe reply: RSiddappa@xxxxxxxxxx: "RE: DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?"
• Maybe reply: John Mistichelli: "RE: DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?"
• Maybe reply: John Mistichelli: "RE: DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?"
• Maybe reply: Bob Sinclair: "Re: DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?"
• Maybe reply: Ahmed Mamoor Amimi: "Re: DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?"
• Maybe reply: Fred Ingham: "Re: DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?"
• Maybe reply: Manny Gonzalez: "Re: DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?"
• Maybe reply: Shadi: "Re: DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?"
• Maybe reply: John Mistichelli: "RE: DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?"
• Maybe reply: Ahmed Mamoor Amimi: "Re: DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?"
• Maybe reply: Bob Sinclair: "Re: DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?"
• Maybe reply: Gregg Malcolm: "Re: DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?"
• Maybe reply: Ahmed Mamoor Amimi: "Re: DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?"
• Maybe reply: Gregg Malcolm: "Re: DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?"
• Maybe reply: DAN DORTON: "Re: DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?"
• Maybe reply: Shadi: "Re: DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:56:51 GMT-3