RE: DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?

From: John Mistichelli (jmistichelli@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Mar 03 2002 - 20:39:12 GMT-3

• Next message: Narvaez, Pablo: "RE: NTP"
• Previous message: Babacar Diop: "Calculating number of bytes to assign to a queue"
• Maybe in reply to: Bob Sinclair: "DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?"
• Next in thread: Manny Gonzalez: "Re: DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
I have reproduced this in a lab. Lab equipment courtesy of www.routopia.com.
Yeah, sure, that was a plug...

R1 - frame - R5 - Frame - R2

R5 is the only one with remote peer statements. R1 and R2 have 2 peers each,
a promiscuos peer with R5 and POD with each other. Hope that helps...

R1#sho run
hostname R1

dlsw local-peer peer-id 1.1.1.1 group 1 promiscuous
dlsw bridge-group 1
!
interface Loopback0
 ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255
!
interface Ethernet0/0
 no ip address
 half-duplex
 bridge-group 1
!
interface Serial0/0
 ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
 encapsulation frame-relay
 no fair-queue
 cdp enable
!
router rip
 version 2
 network 1.0.0.0
 network 10.0.0.0

R1#sho dlsw pe
Peers: state pkts_rx pkts_tx type drops ckts TCP
uptime

 TCP 5.5.5.5 CONNECT 116 2579 prom 0 0 0
00:50:57

 TCP 2.2.2.2 CONNECT 17 13 pod 0 0 0
00:01:33

Total number of connected peers: 2
Total number of connections: 2

R1#

• Next message: Narvaez, Pablo: "RE: NTP"
• Previous message: Babacar Diop: "Calculating number of bytes to assign to a queue"
• Maybe in reply to: Bob Sinclair: "DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?"
• Next in thread: Manny Gonzalez: "Re: DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:56:51 GMT-3