From: Bob Sinclair (bsin@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Mar 03 2002 - 18:31:50 GMT-3
I have used POD to get B to set up a circuit between A and C. In that scenario
, you do not require a full mesh. But in every example I have seen, A and C po
int to B with remote peer statements that make them part of the group. Does PO
D work when the spokes have no (nada, none) remote peer statements at all?
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Mistichelli" <jmistichelli@yahoo.com>
To: "Bob Sinclair" <bsin@erols.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 03, 2002 3:50 PM
Subject: RE: DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?
> Yes, its called Peer-on-demand.
>
> It is on by default. All you have to do is configure the router with the
> peer statements as a border peer.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Bob Sinclair
> Sent: Sunday, March 03, 2002 2:03 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?
>
>
> DLSW Gurus,
>
> Is it possible to have a circuit set up between two routers if neither of
> them has any remote peer statements? Suppose you have routers A, B and C
> runnng DLSW. B has remote peer statements to both A and C. A and C are
> promiscuous. Absolutely no peer statements on A or C. Can a device
> attached to A connect to a device attached to C? Would static resources
> help?
>
> Thanks. Just Wondering.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:56:51 GMT-3