From: Jason Sinclair (sinclairj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Mar 03 2002 - 20:16:03 GMT-3
Bob,
I would say try using promiscuous on the spokes and defining the remote peer
on the border routers. Then I think this will work for you.
Ie
SpokeA
-------------------------------------------borderA--------------------------
----------------borderB---------------------------------spokeB
(no remote-peer statement) (remote-peer spoke B and borderB)
(remote-peer spoke B and borderB) (no remote-peer statement)
(border statement)
(border stament)
Cheers,
Jason Sinclair
Manager, Network Support Group
POWERTEL
Ground Level, 55 Clarence Street,
SYDNEY NSW 2000
AUSTRALIA
office: + 61 2 8264 3820
mobile: + 61 416 105 858
* sinclairj@powertel.com.au
-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Sinclair [mailto:bsin@erols.com]
Sent: Monday, 4 March 2002 07:32
To: John Mistichelli
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer
statements?
I have used POD to get B to set up a circuit between A and
C. In that scenario, you do not require a full mesh. But in every example
I have seen, A and C point to B with remote peer statements that make them
part of the group. Does POD work when the spokes have no (nada, none)
remote peer statements at all?
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Mistichelli" <jmistichelli@yahoo.com>
To: "Bob Sinclair" <bsin@erols.com>;
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 03, 2002 3:50 PM
Subject: RE: DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?
> Yes, its called Peer-on-demand.
>
> It is on by default. All you have to do is configure the
router with the
> peer statements as a border peer.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com
[mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Bob Sinclair
> Sent: Sunday, March 03, 2002 2:03 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?
>
>
> DLSW Gurus,
>
> Is it possible to have a circuit set up between two
routers if neither of
> them has any remote peer statements? Suppose you have
routers A, B and C
> runnng DLSW. B has remote peer statements to both A and
C. A and C are
> promiscuous. Absolutely no peer statements on A or C.
Can a device
> attached to A connect to a device attached to C? Would
static resources
> help?
>
> Thanks. Just Wondering.
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:56:51 GMT-3