From: Bob Sinclair (bsin@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Mar 03 2002 - 23:47:30 GMT-3
It appears that the minimum number of remote peer statements is N-1, where N is
the number of peers. You could have the border peer point to its spokes, or yo
u could have the spokes point to the border, or some combination.
----- Original Message -----
From: <RSiddappa@NECBNS.com>
To: <gonzalu@nyp.org>; <jmistichelli@yahoo.com>
Cc: <greggm@sbcglobal.net>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 03, 2002 9:20 PM
Subject: RE: DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?
> What happens if they say,
>
> Each peer can have only one remote-peer statement.
>
> Can we do it like this
>
> R1----------------R2------------------R3
>
> R1 will have remote peer to R2 and a promiscuous statement.
> R2 will have remote peer for R3 and a promiscuous statement.
> R3 will have remote perr for R1 and a promiscuous statement.
>
>
> R.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Manny Gonzalez [mailto:gonzalu@nyp.org]
> Sent: Sunday, March 03, 2002 7:57 PM
> To: John Mistichelli
> Cc: Gregg Malcolm; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?
>
>
> Exactly, you MUST have a remote peer statement somewhere. Whether is
> HUB to SPOKES or SPOKES to HUB... also, POD will form across a border as
> well... not just within a group but from group 1 to group two peers.
>
> eMGee
>
> John Mistichelli wrote:
> >
> > I have reproduced this in a lab. Lab equipment courtesy of
> www.routopia.com.
> > Yeah, sure, that was a plug...
> >
> > R1 - frame - R5 - Frame - R2
> >
> > R5 is the only one with remote peer statements. R1 and R2 have 2 peers
> each,
> > a promiscuos peer with R5 and POD with each other. Hope that helps...
> >
> > R1#sho run
> > hostname R1
> >
> > dlsw local-peer peer-id 1.1.1.1 group 1 promiscuous
> > dlsw bridge-group 1
> > !
> > interface Loopback0
> > ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255
> > !
> > interface Ethernet0/0
> > no ip address
> > half-duplex
> > bridge-group 1
> > !
> > interface Serial0/0
> > ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
> > encapsulation frame-relay
> > no fair-queue
> > cdp enable
> > !
> > router rip
> > version 2
> > network 1.0.0.0
> > network 10.0.0.0
> >
> > R1#sho dlsw pe
> > Peers: state pkts_rx pkts_tx type drops ckts TCP
> > uptime
> >
> > TCP 5.5.5.5 CONNECT 116 2579 prom 0 0 0
> > 00:50:57
> >
> > TCP 2.2.2.2 CONNECT 17 13 pod 0 0 0
> > 00:01:33
> >
> > Total number of connected peers: 2
> > Total number of connections: 2
> >
> > R1#
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:56:52 GMT-3