From: Manny Gonzalez (gonzalu@xxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Mar 04 2002 - 01:16:58 GMT-3
Hey John, no, I was not.... I was basically using your email as
reassurance to the fact. I was using your email for my point, not going
against your point.
BTW, you were a proctor of mine in a Cisco class at Mentor a few years
back... Congrats on the number...
John Mistichelli wrote:
>
> I don't think anyone was disputing that. No one said you could do it with NO
> peer statements. It looks as if you are getting a little overly excited
> about this. Go back and re-read the previous emails and you will see that.
> Thanks.
>
> John
> 7536
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Manny Gonzalez [mailto:gonzalu@nyp.org]
> Sent: Sunday, March 03, 2002 8:57 PM
> To: John Mistichelli
> Cc: Gregg Malcolm; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: DLSW: Circuits with no remote peer statements?
>
> Exactly, you MUST have a remote peer statement somewhere. Whether is
> HUB to SPOKES or SPOKES to HUB... also, POD will form across a border as
> well... not just within a group but from group 1 to group two peers.
>
> eMGee
>
> John Mistichelli wrote:
> >
> > I have reproduced this in a lab. Lab equipment courtesy of
> www.routopia.com.
> > Yeah, sure, that was a plug...
> >
> > R1 - frame - R5 - Frame - R2
> >
> > R5 is the only one with remote peer statements. R1 and R2 have 2 peers
> each,
> > a promiscuos peer with R5 and POD with each other. Hope that helps...
> >
> > R1#sho run
> > hostname R1
> >
> > dlsw local-peer peer-id 1.1.1.1 group 1 promiscuous
> > dlsw bridge-group 1
> > !
> > interface Loopback0
> > ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255
> > !
> > interface Ethernet0/0
> > no ip address
> > half-duplex
> > bridge-group 1
> > !
> > interface Serial0/0
> > ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
> > encapsulation frame-relay
> > no fair-queue
> > cdp enable
> > !
> > router rip
> > version 2
> > network 1.0.0.0
> > network 10.0.0.0
> >
> > R1#sho dlsw pe
> > Peers: state pkts_rx pkts_tx type drops ckts TCP
> > uptime
> >
> > TCP 5.5.5.5 CONNECT 116 2579 prom 0 0 0
> > 00:50:57
> >
> > TCP 2.2.2.2 CONNECT 17 13 pod 0 0 0
> > 00:01:33
> >
> > Total number of connected peers: 2
> > Total number of connections: 2
> >
> > R1#
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:56:52 GMT-3