If you were to look through the archives, it's fairly easy to come up an accurate picture of what to expect from the lab. Vendors and test takers alike post information; such as test taking strategies and trends in labs (having more IGP / Frame-Relay complete). I don't see people on this list ever post exact examples of what their labs were like, but I wanted to raise the question of what is considered acceptable. Has anyone been contacted by Cisco and asked to stop being liberal with information or had a more stringent penalty applied to them?
I know the easy way out is to provide responses like, "If you study the right way, you'll be fine." However, I was provided with helpful information from those who had been through the process and I don't mind giving back. Could you guys give some feedback of where you think the line is and what might be considered gray?
-ryan
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Fri Jun 05 2009 - 08:30:56 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jul 01 2009 - 20:02:36 ART