Wordings game again .. help

From: GAURAV MADAN (gauravmadan1177@gmail.com)
Date: Sat Feb 14 2009 - 07:46:09 ARST


Hi

Althogh I know of solution ; sometimes its the wording that i dont
understand ... This time I had a task stating :

R1 ------------ Fr --------------------- R2

[A] Use only physical interfaces to configure FR between R1 and R2
[B] Do not use frame-relay map CLI
[C] R2 shoud not send frame-relay inverse-arp request out FR cloud

My interpretation
---------------------------
[A] i cant use p2p or p2multipoint sub interface
[B] alright .. clear .. i cant use map
[C] i will issue "no frame-rel inverse-arp" on R2 ..

I came with following sol (PPPoFR)

Rack1R2(config-if)#do sh run int s0/0/0
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 230 bytes
!
interface Serial0/0/0
 no ip address
 ip pim sparse-mode
 encapsulation frame-relay
 no fair-queue
 frame-relay traffic-shaping
 frame-relay interface-dlci 201 ppp Virtual-Template1 <<<<<<<
  class TEST
 no frame-relay inverse-arp
end

Same on R1 as well

1) I have not used sub int . its on main interface only
2) No map statement used .
3) I am not sending inverse arp req as well

Which requirement have I violated ? Please suggest

Best Regards
Gaurav Madan

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Mar 01 2009 - 09:44:11 ARST