RE: Wordings game again .. help

From: Kgabo Seopa (kgabo.seopa@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Feb 16 2009 - 01:33:54 ARST


I thought rule "[B] Do not use frame-relay map CLI" is for both router R1 &
R2?

GAURAV, can you clarify?

If its true, then the only solution I could think of is PPPoFR because after
all, you are using the physical interface for frame relay. They did not
specify that you are not allowed to introduce new virtual interface.

Does use physical interface mean that you have to configure the IP on it? Or
just mean you must not use subs? I always thought it's the later.

Kind Regards,
KG

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
nowy1981
Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2009 6:16 PM
To: GAURAV MADAN
Cc: Cisco certification
Subject: Re: Wordings game again .. help

You are not right, pppofr breaks 1 (use physical).
In your example R2 should not sends iARP, but R1 can, once R1 sends iARP
at the same time, it provides the remote system (R2) with the Layer 3
address of the local system (R1).

Solution:

R1
interface Serial0/0
 ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
 encapsulation frame-relay

R1#show frame-relay map
Serial0/0 (up): ip 10.0.0.2 dlci 102(0x66,0x1860), dynamic,
              broadcast,, status defined, active

R2
interface Serial0/0
 ip address 10.0.0.2 255.255.255.0
 encapsulation frame-relay

R2#show frame-relay map
Serial0/0 (up): ip 10.0.0.1 dlci 201(0xC9,0x3090), dynamic,
              broadcast,, status defined, active

GAURAV MADAN pisze:
> Hi
>
> Althogh I know of solution ; sometimes its the wording that i dont
> understand ... This time I had a task stating :
>
>
> R1 ------------ Fr --------------------- R2
>
>
> [A] Use only physical interfaces to configure FR between R1 and R2
> [B] Do not use frame-relay map CLI
> [C] R2 shoud not send frame-relay inverse-arp request out FR cloud
>
> My interpretation
> ---------------------------
> [A] i cant use p2p or p2multipoint sub interface
> [B] alright .. clear .. i cant use map
> [C] i will issue "no frame-rel inverse-arp" on R2 ..
>
>
> I came with following sol (PPPoFR)
>
> Rack1R2(config-if)#do sh run int s0/0/0
> Building configuration...
> Current configuration : 230 bytes
> !
> interface Serial0/0/0
> no ip address
> ip pim sparse-mode
> encapsulation frame-relay
> no fair-queue
> frame-relay traffic-shaping
> frame-relay interface-dlci 201 ppp Virtual-Template1 <<<<<<<
> class TEST
> no frame-relay inverse-arp
> end
>
>
> Same on R1 as well
>
> 1) I have not used sub int . its on main interface only
> 2) No map statement used .
> 3) I am not sending inverse arp req as well
>
>
> Which requirement have I violated ? Please suggest
>
> Best Regards
> Gaurav Madan
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Mar 01 2009 - 09:44:11 ARST