Re: Wordings game again .. help

From: karim jamali (karim.jamali@gmail.com)
Date: Sat Feb 14 2009 - 11:26:20 ARST

Hey,

With physical frame-relay interfaces two choices exists (inverse-arp and
static mapping).
Since both are not allowed and the physical frame-relay is imposed,the only
solution is PPP over Frame-Relay/

I dont see anything wrong with your choice of solution.

Regards,

On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 12:46 PM, GAURAV MADAN <gauravmadan1177@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi
>
> Althogh I know of solution ; sometimes its the wording that i dont
> understand ... This time I had a task stating :
>
>
> R1 ------------ Fr --------------------- R2
>
>
> [A] Use only physical interfaces to configure FR between R1 and R2
> [B] Do not use frame-relay map CLI
> [C] R2 shoud not send frame-relay inverse-arp request out FR cloud
>
> My interpretation
> ---------------------------
> [A] i cant use p2p or p2multipoint sub interface
> [B] alright .. clear .. i cant use map
> [C] i will issue "no frame-rel inverse-arp" on R2 ..
>
>
> I came with following sol (PPPoFR)
>
> Rack1R2(config-if)#do sh run int s0/0/0
> Building configuration...
> Current configuration : 230 bytes
> !
> interface Serial0/0/0
> no ip address
> ip pim sparse-mode
> encapsulation frame-relay
> no fair-queue
> frame-relay traffic-shaping
> frame-relay interface-dlci 201 ppp Virtual-Template1 <<<<<<<
> class TEST
> no frame-relay inverse-arp
> end
>
>
> Same on R1 as well
>
> 1) I have not used sub int . its on main interface only
> 2) No map statement used .
> 3) I am not sending inverse arp req as well
>
>
> Which requirement have I violated ? Please suggest
>
> Best Regards
> Gaurav Madan
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 

-- 
KJ

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Mar 01 2009 - 09:44:11 ARST