From: GAURAV MADAN (gauravmadan1177@gmail.com)
Date: Sat Feb 14 2009 - 13:02:40 ARST
I understand what u r saying .. this is not wrong .
my query was .. is my sol of PPPoFR wrong ?
On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 8:10 PM, NET HE <he_net@hotmail.com> wrote:
> There are 2 functions for "frame-rel inverse-arp",
> -proactively advertise out its own IP address
> -proactively query remote site's IP address
>
> and "no frame-relay inverse-arp" doesn't disable answering to the ip query
> from remote sites.
>
> So in your case,
> [A] Use only physical interfaces to configure FR between R1 and R2
> [B] Do not use frame-relay map CLI
> [C] R2 shoud not send frame-relay inverse-arp request out FR cloud
>
> I would disable frame-relay inverse-arp on R2, but keep frame-relay
> inverse-arp enabled on R1. Therefore,
>
> R2 will not proactively advertise out its IP address, as well as sending
> out query for remote-site's IP address.
>
> But R1 will proactively advertise out its ip-dhci mapping, as well
> as sending out query for remote-site's ip-dlci mapping, which will be
> ansered by R2.
>
> As a result, R2 will know ip-dlci mapping for R1 because of R1's proactive
> advertisement, and R1 will know ip-dlci mapping for R2 because of R2's
> answer.
>
> Lab it up will help you.
>
> Hope it helps.
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Net (Xin) He
>
>
>
>
> > Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 19:10:45 +0530
> > Subject: Re: Wordings game again .. help
> > From: gauravmadan1177@gmail.com
> > To: karim.jamali@gmail.com
> > CC: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>
> >
> > Thats what i though also
> > wanted some comments from the group as well .. hence drafted a mail .
> > thnx
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 6:56 PM, karim jamali <karim.jamali@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >
> > > Hey,
> > >
> > > With physical frame-relay interfaces two choices exists (inverse-arp
> and
> > > static mapping).
> > > Since both are not allowed and the physical frame-relay is imposed,the
> only
> > > solution is PPP over Frame-Relay/
> > >
> > > I dont see anything wrong with your choice of solution.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 12:46 PM, GAURAV MADAN <
> > > gauravmadan1177@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi
> > >>
> > >> Althogh I know of solution ; sometimes its the wording that i dont
> > >> understand ... This time I had a task stating :
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> R1 ------------ Fr --------------------- R2
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> [A] Use only physical interfaces to configure FR between R1 and R2
> > >> [B] Do not use frame-relay map CLI
> > >> [C] R2 shoud not send frame-relay inverse-arp request out FR cloud
> > >>
> > >> My interpretation
> > >> ---------------------------
> > >> [A] i cant use p2p or p2multipoint sub interface
> > >> [B] alright .. clear .. i cant use map
> > >> [C] i will issue "no frame-rel inverse-arp" on R2 ..
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> I came with following sol (PPPoFR)
> > >>
> > >> Rack1R2(config-if)#do sh run int s0/0/0
> > >> Building configuration...
> > >> Current configuration : 230 bytes
> > >> !
> > >> interface Serial0/0/0
> > >> no ip address
> > >> ip pim sparse-mode
> > >> encapsulation frame-relay
> > >> no fair-queue
> > >> frame-relay traffic-shaping
> > >> frame-relay interface-dlci 201 ppp Virtual-Template1 <<<<<<<
> > >> class TEST
> > >> no frame-relay inverse-arp
> > >> end
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Same on R1 as well
> > >>
> > >> 1) I have not used sub int . its on main interface only
> > >> 2) No map statement used .
> > >> 3) I am not sending inverse arp req as well
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Which requirement have I violated ? Please suggest
> > >>
> > >> Best Regards
> > >> Gaurav Madan
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> > >>
> > >>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > >> Subscription information may be found at:
> > >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > KJ
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------
> So many new options, so little time. Windows Live Messenger.<http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowslive/products/messenger.aspx>
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Mar 01 2009 - 09:44:11 ARST