From: James MacDonald (j4m3sm63@yahoo.ca)
Date: Fri Jan 16 2009 - 23:31:44 ARST
Just did a lab asking for mutual redistribution of OSPFv3 and RIPng ... i used the following:
ipv6 router ospf 1
redistribute rip RIP include-connected
ipv6 router rip RIP
redistribute ospf 1 metric 1 include-connected
... verification seems to check out fine ... the solution seems to have a different approach:
ipv6 router ospf 1
redistribute rip RIP
redistribute connected
ipv6 router rip RIP
redistribute ospf 1 metric 1
redistribute connected metric 1
... is there any major difference in how these 2 methods perform? Is there a reason to use method 2 over method 1 (assuming you do want the connected routes also of course) ... i know both work, i'm just wondering if there is something extra special in the 2nd method i may need to know about.
thanks,
------------------------------
Jim MacDonald
j4m3sm63@yahoo.ca
------------------------------
__________________________________________________________________
Instant Messaging, free SMS, sharing photos and more... Try the new Yahoo! Canada Messenger at http://ca.beta.messenger.yahoo.com/
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Mar 01 2009 - 09:43:38 ARST