From: Brian Landers (brian@bluecoat93.org)
Date: Sat Jan 17 2009 - 01:07:53 ARST
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Anthony Sequeira
<asequeira@internetworkexpert.com> wrote:
> If I were a proctor and I made you take the time to configure two different
> IPv6 routing domains, I certainly would not then have you take a bunch of
> time for a very complex redistribution scenario. As you pointed out - too
> cruel and too out of balance for the rest of the lab.
When I went through my recent bootcamp with [vendor with initials IE
that Anthony doesn't work for], Jared had an evil idea: a CCIE lab
that was 100% IPv6 in the core network. No IPv4 between devices at
all. He mentioned discussing this briefly with a proctor and said the
response was "hmm, that's an interesting idea..."
My initial thought was that there's not enough IPv6-related material
on the blueprint to make a challenging lab, but nothing says you
couldn't have pockets of IPv4 for your services, security, and whatnot
tunneled or NATed across the IPv6 core.
*shudder* I'm not sure if even Scott could come up with something *that* evil.
-- Brian Landers CCIE #23115Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Mar 01 2009 - 09:43:38 ARST