Re: IPV6 - redistribution

From: Anthony Sequeira (asequeira@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Sat Jan 17 2009 - 00:16:43 ARST


It would appear the only difference is that with the second approach
you can assign a different metric value for the connected interfaces
versus the non-connected interfaces.

If that is not relevant for your lab scenario - go with the first
approach since you can get it done with fewer keystrokes.

:-)

Anthony J. Sequeira, CCIE #15626, CCSI #23251
Senior CCIE Instructor

asequeira@internetworkexpert.com

Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987
Outside US: 775-826-4344

On Jan 16, 2009, at 8:31 PM, James MacDonald wrote:

> Just did a lab asking for mutual redistribution of OSPFv3 and
> RIPng ... i used the following:
>
> ipv6 router ospf 1
> redistribute rip RIP include-connected
> ipv6 router rip RIP
> redistribute ospf 1 metric 1 include-connected
>
> ... verification seems to check out fine ... the solution seems to
> have a different approach:
>
> ipv6 router ospf 1
> redistribute rip RIP
> redistribute connected
> ipv6 router rip RIP
> redistribute ospf 1 metric 1
> redistribute connected metric 1
>
> ... is there any major difference in how these 2 methods perform? Is
> there a reason to use method 2 over method 1 (assuming you do want
> the connected routes also of course) ... i know both work, i'm just
> wondering if there is something extra special in the 2nd method i
> may need to know about.
>
> thanks,
>
>
> ------------------------------
> Jim MacDonald
> j4m3sm63@yahoo.ca
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________
> Instant Messaging, free SMS, sharing photos and more... Try the new
> Yahoo! Canada Messenger at http://ca.beta.messenger.yahoo.com/
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Mar 01 2009 - 09:43:38 ARST