From: James MacDonald (j4m3sm63@yahoo.ca)
Date: Sat Jan 17 2009 - 00:23:59 ARST
thanks for the quick reply ... i was hoping there wasn't some "hidden" feature or lack-there-of that would get me ... that makes sense that it's just 2 ways of doing it with one offering a little granularity ... one of my biggest fears is to walk into the lab and get mutual redistribution at multiple points ... in IPv6! I don't think Cisco would be that cruel though ... :)
------------------------------
Jim MacDonald
j4m3sm63@yahoo.ca
------------------------------
________________________________
From: Anthony Sequeira <asequeira@internetworkexpert.com>
To: James MacDonald <j4m3sm63@yahoo.ca>
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 9:16:43 PM
Subject: Re: IPV6 - redistribution
It would appear the only difference is that with the second approach you can assign a different metric value for the connected interfaces versus the non-connected interfaces.
If that is not relevant for your lab scenario - go with the first approach since you can get it done with fewer keystrokes.
:-)
Anthony J. Sequeira, CCIE #15626, CCSI #23251
Senior CCIE Instructor
asequeira@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987
Outside US: 775-826-4344
On Jan 16, 2009, at 8:31 PM, James MacDonald wrote:
> Just did a lab asking for mutual redistribution of OSPFv3 and RIPng ... i used the following:
>
> ipv6 router ospf 1
> redistribute rip RIP include-connected
> ipv6 router rip RIP
> redistribute ospf 1 metric 1 include-connected
>
> ... verification seems to check out fine ... the solution seems to have a different approach:
>
> ipv6 router ospf 1
> redistribute rip RIP
> redistribute connected
> ipv6 router rip RIP
> redistribute ospf 1 metric 1
> redistribute connected metric 1
>
> ... is there any major difference in how these 2 methods perform? Is there a reason to use method 2 over method 1 (assuming you do want the connected routes also of course) ... i know both work, i'm just wondering if there is something extra special in the 2nd method i may need to know about.
>
> thanks,
>
>
> ------------------------------
> Jim MacDonald
> j4m3sm63@yahoo.ca
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________
> Instant Messaging, free SMS, sharing photos and more... Try the new Yahoo! Canada Messenger at http://ca.beta.messenger.yahoo.com/
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
__________________________________________________________________
Looking for the perfect gift? Give the gift of Flickr!
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Mar 01 2009 - 09:43:38 ARST