From: Shine Joseph (shinepjoseph@iprimus.com.au)
Date: Sat Feb 23 2008 - 17:54:14 ARST
Rodrigo,
I don't think there is a difference in your specific case here. Either would
provide the prefixes learned from the neighbor with a WEIGHT value of 100.
Now, what would you do if a couple prefixes being learned from this
neighbour needs to have a weight attribute of 100? Can you use WEIGHT in the
neighbour statement?
HTH,
Shine
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
rodrigo.gutierrez@nsn.com
Sent: Friday, 22 February 2008 9:46 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: BGP-WEIGHT
Hi,
When using the attribute weight on BGP, what is the difference and when it
should be used either on a route-map or directly with the neighbor, example:
router bgp 100
no synchronization
bgp router-id 150.6.6.6
bgp log-neighbor-changes
neighbor 54.6.3.254 remote-as 54
neighbor 54.6.3.254 weight 100
Versus
router bgp 100
no synchronization
bgp router-id 150.6.6.6
bgp log-neighbor-changes
neighbor 54.6.3.254 remote-as 54
neighbor 54.6.3.254 route-map SET-WEIGHT in
Route-map SET-WEIGHT permit 10
- set weight 100
Thanks
Rodrigo Gutiirrez
IP/Engineer.
Rodrigo Gutiirrez
IP/Engineer.
Cisco Certified Network Professional, CCNP
Mobile Phone # :57-310-580-0973
Monday - Friday : 8:00-16:00 EST
rodrigo.gutierrez@nsn.com
Nokia Siemens Networks
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2008 - 16:54:49 ARST