RE: BGP-WEIGHT

From: Carlos Trujillo Jimenez (nergal888@hotmail.com)
Date: Sat Feb 23 2008 - 17:04:42 ARST


Rodrigo.
You can use it both ways, but using at a route-map means you have more
possibilities of modifying more attributes than only modifying the weight.
I mean you can have more control using a route-map like change more variables
than weight in a set of networks.
For example, you are asked to modify the weight to a given route, and later
you are asked also to modify prepend an as-path to that same route, thus using
a route-map you can do both actions.

> Subject: RE: BGP-WEIGHT> Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:45:34 -0600> From:
rodrigo.gutierrez@nsn.com> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com> > Hi,> > When using the
attribute weight on BGP, what is the difference and when it should be used
either on a route-map or directly with the neighbor, example:> > router bgp
100> no synchronization> bgp router-id 150.6.6.6> bgp log-neighbor-changes>
neighbor 54.6.3.254 remote-as 54> neighbor 54.6.3.254 weight 100> > Versus> >
router bgp 100> no synchronization> bgp router-id 150.6.6.6> bgp
log-neighbor-changes> neighbor 54.6.3.254 remote-as 54> neighbor 54.6.3.254
route-map SET-WEIGHT in> > Route-map SET-WEIGHT permit 10> - set weight 100> >
Thanks> > Rodrigo Gutiirrez> IP/Engineer.> > Rodrigo Gutiirrez> IP/Engineer.>
Cisco Certified Network Professional, CCNP> Mobile Phone # :57-310-580-0973>
Monday - Friday : 8:00-16:00 EST > rodrigo.gutierrez@nsn.com> Nokia Siemens
Networks>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2008 - 16:54:49 ARST