qos for voice

From: John Matus (jmatus@pacbell.net)
Date: Thu Aug 12 2004 - 19:29:11 GMT-3

• Next message: Carlos G Mendioroz: "Re: IEWB Lab1 - 9.6 - Be calculation"
• Previous message: Carlos G Mendioroz: "Callback w/o authentication (was: ISIS over ISDN , IEWB Lab2)"
• Next in thread: James: "Re: qos for voice"
• Maybe reply: James: "Re: qos for voice"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: qos for voice"
• Maybe reply: John Matus: "Re: qos for voice"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: qos for voice"
• Maybe reply: Steven A Ridder: "RE: qos for voice"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: qos for voice"
• Maybe reply: Carlos G Mendioroz: "Re: qos for voice"
• Maybe reply: Richard Dumoulin: "RE: qos for voice"
• Maybe reply: Carlos G Mendioroz: "Re: qos for voice"
• Maybe reply: Richard Dumoulin: "RE: qos for voice"
• Maybe reply: Carlos G Mendioroz: "Re: qos for voice"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: qos for voice"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: qos for voice"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: qos for voice"
• Maybe reply: Carlos G Mendioroz: "Re: qos for voice"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: qos for voice"
• Maybe reply: Carlos G Mendioroz: "Re: qos for voice"
• Maybe reply: Joseph D. Phillips: "Re: qos for voice"
• Maybe reply: Carlos G Mendioroz: "Re: qos for voice"
• Maybe reply: mani poopal: "Re: qos for voice"
• Maybe reply: Richard Dumoulin: "RE: qos for voice"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

is there a difference between the following??

class-map match-all voip
match access-group 101

access-list 101 permit tcp any any 1720
access-list 101 permit udp any any range 16384 32787

AND

class-map match-all voip
match ip rtp 16384 16383

do they perform the same function or are they completely different. i'm
confused :)

John D. Matus
MCSE, CCNP
Office: 818-782-2061
Cell: 818-430-8372
jmatus@pacbell.net

• Next message: Carlos G Mendioroz: "Re: IEWB Lab1 - 9.6 - Be calculation"
• Previous message: Carlos G Mendioroz: "Callback w/o authentication (was: ISIS over ISDN , IEWB Lab2)"
• Next in thread: James: "Re: qos for voice"
• Maybe reply: James: "Re: qos for voice"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: qos for voice"
• Maybe reply: John Matus: "Re: qos for voice"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: qos for voice"
• Maybe reply: Steven A Ridder: "RE: qos for voice"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: qos for voice"
• Maybe reply: Carlos G Mendioroz: "Re: qos for voice"
• Maybe reply: Richard Dumoulin: "RE: qos for voice"
• Maybe reply: Carlos G Mendioroz: "Re: qos for voice"
• Maybe reply: Richard Dumoulin: "RE: qos for voice"
• Maybe reply: Carlos G Mendioroz: "Re: qos for voice"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: qos for voice"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: qos for voice"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: qos for voice"
• Maybe reply: Carlos G Mendioroz: "Re: qos for voice"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: qos for voice"
• Maybe reply: Carlos G Mendioroz: "Re: qos for voice"
• Maybe reply: Joseph D. Phillips: "Re: qos for voice"
• Maybe reply: Carlos G Mendioroz: "Re: qos for voice"
• Maybe reply: mani poopal: "Re: qos for voice"
• Maybe reply: Richard Dumoulin: "RE: qos for voice"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Sep 03 2004 - 07:02:42 GMT-3