From: Richard Dumoulin (richard.dumoulin@vanco.es)
Date: Fri Aug 13 2004 - 07:33:47 GMT-3
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
------_=_NextPart_001_01C48121.0642695F
Content-Type: text/plain
I mean the voice packets once they travel between the voice gateways :-)
-----Original Message-----
From: Carlos G Mendioroz [mailto:tron@huapi.ba.ar]
Sent: viernes, 13 de agosto de 2004 12:12
To: Richard Dumoulin
Cc: Scott Morris; 'lab'
Subject: Re: qos for voice
Yep,
the restriction is only for Voip phones. No phones in the WAN for CME
for the time being (supported at least :-)
Richard Dumoulin wrote:
> There's no RTCP between the ephones and CME but there is between the
> Voice gateways I think, no ?
>
> --Richard
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Carlos G Mendioroz [mailto:tron@huapi.ba.ar]
> Sent: viernes, 13 de agosto de 2004 11:35
> To: Scott Morris
> Cc: 'Steven A Ridder'; 'John Matus'; 'lab'
> Subject: Re: qos for voice
>
>
> Scott Morris wrote:
>
> > Actually, voice streams use a pair of ports (even and odd) for RTP
> and > RTCP stuff (voice data and control).
>
> This depends on what the endpoints are.
> Although true for CCM, this does not hold, e.g., for CME to Voip phone
> AFAIK. No RTCP there.
>
> >
> > The rtp priority command with "16384 16383" numbers isn't a range.
> In > that command, it's the starting port and number of ports >
> (16384+16383=32767) whereas the other command actually is a range with
> > start and stop information. >
> > HTH,
> >
> > Scott
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> > Of Steven A Ridder
> > Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 8:57 PM
> > To: 'John Matus'; swm@emanon.com; 'lab'
> > Subject: RE: qos for voice
> >
> > The difference between the 1st and 2nd statement is as follows:
> >
> > The first statement (the udp 16384...) matched the payload and
> > signal/control traffic where the "IP RTP" statement captures the data
> > packets only. The first statement ensures that ALL RTP traffic
> > (payload and
> > signal) packets get matched. If I remember correctly, each RTP
> stream uses
> > 4 consecutive ports, starting with the first even port above 16384,
> so the
> > first stream uses 16384-16387. It's been a while, but I think that's
> > correct.
> >
> > Steve Ridder
> >
> >
> > -- RFC 1049 Compliant
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> > Of John Matus
> > Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 8:08 PM
> > To: swm@emanon.com; 'lab'
> > Subject: Re: qos for voice
> >
> > i have no idea if it is working........it's a lab scenario
> >
> > i wasn't sure if the 'match rtp' somehow included the tcp 1720. i
> really
> > don't understand the difference between the two statements or why or
> > why not they would be used. any insite you could give would be most
> > helpful!
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Scott Morris" <swm@emanon.com>
> > To: "'John Matus'" <jmatus@pacbell.net>; "'lab'"
> > <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 4:36 PM
> > Subject: RE: qos for voice
> >
> >
> >
> >>Well, off the cuff, it would appear that you aren't matching the H225
> >>call setup (tcp/1720) in your second class. Otherwise, you are either
> >>matching on the RTP header or the UDP header information.
> >>
> >>Do they both work for you? ;)
> >>
> >>
> >>Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,
> >>CISSP, JNCIP, et al. IPExpert CCIE Program Manager
> >>IPExpert Sr. Technical Instructor
> >>swm@emanon.com/smorris@ipexpert.net
> >>http://www.ipexpert.net
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> >>Of
> >
> > John
> >
> >>Matus
> >>Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 6:29 PM
> >>To: lab
> >>Subject: qos for voice
> >>
> >>is there a difference between the following??
> >>
> >>class-map match-all voip
> >>match access-group 101
> >>
> >>access-list 101 permit tcp any any 1720
> >>access-list 101 permit udp any any range 16384 32787
> >>
> >>AND
> >>
> >>class-map match-all voip
> >>match ip rtp 16384 16383
> >>
> >>
> >>do they perform the same function or are they completely different.
> >>i'm confused :)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>John D. Matus
> >>MCSE, CCNP
> >>Office: 818-782-2061
> >>Cell: 818-430-8372
> >>jmatus@pacbell.net
> >>
> >>______________________________________________________________________
> >>_
> >>Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> >>http://shop.groupstudy.com
> >>
> >>Subscription information may be found at:
> >>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > _
> > Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> > http://shop.groupstudy.com
> >
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > _
> > Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> > http://shop.groupstudy.com
> >
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > _
> > Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> > http://shop.groupstudy.com
> >
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
>
> --
> Carlos G Mendioroz <tron@huapi.ba.ar> LW7 EQI Argentina
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> Any opinions expressed in the email are those of the individual and
> not
> necessarily the company. This email and any files transmitted with it
> are confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient. If
> you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for
> delivering it to the intended recipient, be advised that you have
> received this email in error and that any dissemination, distribution,
> copying or use is strictly prohibited.
>
> If you have received this email in error, or if you are concerned with
> the content of this email please e-mail to: e-security.support@vanco.info
>
> The contents of an attachment to this e-mail may contain software
> viruses which could damage your own computer system. While the sender
> has taken every reasonable precaution to minimise this risk, we cannot
> accept liability for any damage which you sustain as a result of
> software viruses. You should carry out your own virus checks before
> opening any attachments to this e-mail.
> **********************************************************************
-- Carlos G Mendioroz <tron@huapi.ba.ar> LW7 EQI Argentina------_=_NextPart_001_01C48121.0642695F Content-Type: text/html Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> <HTML> <HEAD> <META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; = charset=3Dus-ascii"> <META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version = 5.5.2650.12"> <TITLE>RE: qos for voice</TITLE> </HEAD> <BODY>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>I mean the voice packets once they travel between the = voice gateways :-)</FONT> </P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>-----Original Message-----</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>From: Carlos G Mendioroz [<A = HREF=3D"mailto:tron@huapi.ba.ar">mailto:tron@huapi.ba.ar</A>] </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Sent: viernes, 13 de agosto de 2004 12:12</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>To: Richard Dumoulin</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Cc: Scott Morris; 'lab'</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Subject: Re: qos for voice</FONT> </P> <BR>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Yep,</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>the restriction is only for Voip phones. No phones = in the WAN for CME </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>for the time being (supported at least :-)</FONT> </P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Richard Dumoulin wrote:</FONT> </P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>> There's no RTCP between the ephones and CME but = there is between the</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> Voice gateways I think, no ?</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> --Richard</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> -----Original Message-----</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> From: Carlos G Mendioroz [<A = HREF=3D"mailto:tron@huapi.ba.ar">mailto:tron@huapi.ba.ar</A>]</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> Sent: viernes, 13 de agosto de 2004 = 11:35</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> To: Scott Morris</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> Cc: 'Steven A Ridder'; 'John Matus'; = 'lab'</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> Subject: Re: qos for voice</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> Scott Morris wrote:</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> > Actually, voice streams use a pair = of ports (even and odd) for RTP </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> and > RTCP stuff (voice data and = control).</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> This depends on what the endpoints are.</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> Although true for CCM, this does not hold, = e.g., for CME to Voip phone </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> AFAIK. No RTCP there.</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> ></FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> > The rtp priority command with = "16384 16383" numbers isn't a range. </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> In > that command, it's the starting = port and number of ports > </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> (16384+16383=3D32767) whereas the other command = actually is a range with </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> > start and stop information. = ></FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> > HTH,</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> ></FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> > Scott</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> ></FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> > -----Original Message-----</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [<A = HREF=3D"mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com">mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com</A>] = On Behalf</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> > Of Steven A Ridder</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> > Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 8:57 = PM</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> > To: 'John Matus'; swm@emanon.com; = 'lab'</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> > Subject: RE: qos for voice</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> ></FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> > The difference between the 1st and = 2nd statement is as follows:</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> ></FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> > The first statement (the udp = 16384...) matched the payload and</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> > signal/control traffic where the = "IP RTP" statement captures the data</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> > packets only. The first = statement ensures that ALL RTP traffic</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> > (payload and</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> > signal) packets get matched. = If I remember correctly, each RTP </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> stream uses</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> > 4 consecutive ports, starting with = the first even port above 16384, </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> so the</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> > first stream uses 16384-16387. = It's been a while, but I think that's</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> > correct.</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> ></FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> > Steve Ridder</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> > </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> ></FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> > -- RFC 1049 Compliant</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> ></FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> > -----Original Message-----</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [<A = HREF=3D"mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com">mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com</A>] = On Behalf</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> > Of John Matus</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> > Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 8:08 = PM</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> > To: swm@emanon.com; 'lab'</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> > Subject: Re: qos for voice</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> ></FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> > i have no idea if it is = working........it's a lab scenario</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> ></FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> > i wasn't sure if the 'match rtp' = somehow included the tcp 1720. i </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> really</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> > don't understand the difference = between the two statements or why or</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> > why not they would be used. = any insite you could give would be most</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> > helpful!</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> ></FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> ></FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> > ----- Original Message -----</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> > From: "Scott Morris" = <swm@emanon.com></FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> > To: "'John Matus'" = <jmatus@pacbell.net>; "'lab'"</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> > = <ccielab@groupstudy.com></FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> > Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 4:36 = PM</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> > Subject: RE: qos for voice</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> ></FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> ></FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> ></FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> >>Well, off the cuff, it would = appear that you aren't matching the H225</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> >>call setup (tcp/1720) in your = second class. Otherwise, you are either</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> >>matching on the RTP header or the = UDP header information.</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> >></FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> >>Do they both work for you? = ;)</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> >></FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> >></FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> >>Scott Morris, CCIE4 = (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> >>CISSP, JNCIP, et al. IPExpert = CCIE Program Manager</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> >>IPExpert Sr. Technical = Instructor</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> = >>swm@emanon.com/smorris@ipexpert.net</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> >><A = HREF=3D"http://www.ipexpert.net" = TARGET=3D"_blank">http://www.ipexpert.net></FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> >></FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> >></FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> >></FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> >>-----Original Message-----</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> >>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [<A = HREF=3D"mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com">mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com</A>] = On Behalf</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> >>Of</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> ></FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> > John</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> ></FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> >>Matus</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> >>Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 = 6:29 PM</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> >>To: lab</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> >>Subject: qos for voice</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> >></FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> >>is there a difference between the = following??</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> >></FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> >>class-map match-all voip</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> >>match access-group 101</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> >></FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> >>access-list 101 permit tcp any = any 1720</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> >>access-list 101 permit udp any = any range 16384 32787</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> >></FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> >>AND</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> >></FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> >>class-map match-all voip</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> >>match ip rtp 16384 16383</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> >></FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> >></FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> >>do they perform the same function = or are they completely different. </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> >>i'm confused :)</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> >></FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> >></FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> >></FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> >>John D. Matus</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> >>MCSE, CCNP</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> >>Office: 818-782-2061</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> >>Cell: 818-430-8372</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> >>jmatus@pacbell.net</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> >></FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> = >>________________________________________________________________= ______</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> >>_</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> >>Please help support GroupStudy by = purchasing your study materials from:</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> >><A = HREF=3D"http://shop.groupstudy.com" = TARGET=3D"_blank">http://shop.groupstudy.com></FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> >></FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> >>Subscription information may be = found at:</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> >><A = HREF=3D"http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html" = TARGET=3D"_blank">http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html></FONT>=
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> ></FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> ></FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> > =
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Sep 03 2004 - 07:02:42 GMT-3