RE: qos for voice

From: Steven A Ridder (saridder@hotmail.com)
Date: Thu Aug 12 2004 - 21:56:49 GMT-3


The difference between the 1st and 2nd statement is as follows:

The first statement (the udp 16384...) matched the payload and
signal/control traffic where the "IP RTP" statement captures the data
packets only. The first statement ensures that ALL RTP traffic (payload and
signal) packets get matched. If I remember correctly, each RTP stream uses
4 consecutive ports, starting with the first even port above 16384, so the
first stream uses 16384-16387. It's been a while, but I think that's
correct.

Steve Ridder
 

-- RFC 1049 Compliant

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of John
Matus
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 8:08 PM
To: swm@emanon.com; 'lab'
Subject: Re: qos for voice

i have no idea if it is working........it's a lab scenario

i wasn't sure if the 'match rtp' somehow included the tcp 1720. i really
don't understand the difference between the two statements or why or why not
they would be used. any insite you could give would be most helpful!

----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott Morris" <swm@emanon.com>
To: "'John Matus'" <jmatus@pacbell.net>; "'lab'" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 4:36 PM
Subject: RE: qos for voice

> Well, off the cuff, it would appear that you aren't matching the H225 call
> setup (tcp/1720) in your second class. Otherwise, you are either matching
> on the RTP header or the UDP header information.
>
> Do they both work for you? ;)
>
>
> Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, CISSP,
> JNCIP, et al.
> IPExpert CCIE Program Manager
> IPExpert Sr. Technical Instructor
> swm@emanon.com/smorris@ipexpert.net
> http://www.ipexpert.net
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
John
> Matus
> Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 6:29 PM
> To: lab
> Subject: qos for voice
>
> is there a difference between the following??
>
> class-map match-all voip
> match access-group 101
>
> access-list 101 permit tcp any any 1720
> access-list 101 permit udp any any range 16384 32787
>
> AND
>
> class-map match-all voip
> match ip rtp 16384 16383
>
>
> do they perform the same function or are they completely different. i'm
> confused :)
>
>
>
> John D. Matus
> MCSE, CCNP
> Office: 818-782-2061
> Cell: 818-430-8372
> jmatus@pacbell.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Sep 03 2004 - 07:02:42 GMT-3