Re: RIPNg over frame-relay multipoint interfaces! (Narbik WB)

That's the way I see it. If it surprises you, then think about why it
does. What is that the broadcast keyword actually does ?

-Carlos

Andy Hogard @ 20/08/2012 09:33 -0300 dixit:
> Hmm, So if I give broadcast keyword with the map of link-local or with
> map of global ipv6 address it should not matter as it is being sent out
> on dlci 102 anywhich ways.. no one method is correct over the other is it?
>
> Regards,
> Andy.
>
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar
> <mailto:tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>> wrote:
>
> Why does it surprise you ?
> You are saying the same thing: if it is an IPv6 multicast send it
> via DLCI 102.
>
> -Carlos
>
>
> Andy Hogard @ 20/08/2012 08:38 -0300 dixit:
>
> I was going through my Narbik set of WB's, and have realised that
>
>
> R1 ------------------------------__-------------------------- R2
> s2/0 s2/0
>
>
> R1,
> !
> interface Serial1/0
> no ip address
> encapsulation frame-relay
> ipv6 address FE80::1 link-local
> ipv6 address 2000:1:1:12::1/64
> ipv6 rip cisco12 enable
> no fair-queue
> serial restart-delay 0
> frame-relay map ipv6 FE80::2 102
> frame-relay map ipv6 2000:1:1:12::2 102 broadcast
> end
> !
>
> For R1 R2 RIPNg peering to work, in which frame-map should I
> configure the
> broadcast keyword... link-local or global. I have tried it on
> both turn by
> turn, it seems to work fine either ways eh!?
>
>
> --
> Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar <mailto:tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>>
> LW7 EQI Argentina
>
>
>
>
> --
> My Blog URL: http://ccielog.blogspot.com/

-- 
Carlos G Mendioroz  <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>  LW7 EQI  Argentina
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net