Re: RIPNg over frame-relay multipoint interfaces! (Narbik WB)

Hmm, So if I give broadcast keyword with the map of link-local or with map
of global ipv6 address it should not matter as it is being sent out on dlci
102 anywhich ways.. no one method is correct over the other is it?

Regards,
Andy.

On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>wrote:

> Why does it surprise you ?
> You are saying the same thing: if it is an IPv6 multicast send it via DLCI
> 102.
>
> -Carlos
>
>
> Andy Hogard @ 20/08/2012 08:38 -0300 dixit:
>
> I was going through my Narbik set of WB's, and have realised that
>>
>>
>> R1 ------------------------------**-------------------------- R2
>> s2/0 s2/0
>>
>>
>> R1,
>> !
>> interface Serial1/0
>> no ip address
>> encapsulation frame-relay
>> ipv6 address FE80::1 link-local
>> ipv6 address 2000:1:1:12::1/64
>> ipv6 rip cisco12 enable
>> no fair-queue
>> serial restart-delay 0
>> frame-relay map ipv6 FE80::2 102
>> frame-relay map ipv6 2000:1:1:12::2 102 broadcast
>> end
>> !
>>
>> For R1 R2 RIPNg peering to work, in which frame-map should I configure the
>> broadcast keyword... link-local or global. I have tried it on both turn by
>> turn, it seems to work fine either ways eh!?
>>
>>
> --
> Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar> LW7 EQI Argentina
>

-- 
My Blog URL: http://ccielog.blogspot.com/
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net