Understanding why UdLD was created would help.  Here is a way to test it.... This is the reason UdLD was created.
                      Sw1
                    Tx. Rx 
                     /.    \
                    /.      \
                 Rx.      Tx
              Sw2.      Sw3
 
You will need to separate the TX and RX on one end of the cable and connect to opposite devices.  
Regards,
 Joe Sanchez
On Apr 5, 2012, at 8:05 AM, Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar> wrote:
> Sorry, what I meant is that you can not simulate a failure by cutting a wire on 1000baseT, i.e., gig over copper.
> 
> Still I don't know what you are asking for...
> 
> -Carlos
> 
> sundeep sadhwani @ 05/04/2012 10:00 -0300 dixit:
>> Thanks for the reply.however i am using gig at the 4500 side i see that
>> the port is down at the 4500 side.
>> 
>> I have faced this issue in the live network where we have to change the
>> fibre cable as both the interfaces were up and bcoz of cdp we came to
>> know that there is unidirectional link failure as 4500 was able to see
>> GSR but GSR was unable to see 4500. we cant use UDLD in this scenario as
>> GSR interface is layer 3.
>> 
>> Regards
>> Sundeep
>> 
>> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 8:38 PM, Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar
>> <mailto:tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>> wrote:
>> 
>>    What do you mean by simulate ? Cause you have already done that
>>    by removing one fibre!
>> 
>>    In a 10/100 ethernet you can cut one wire. No such luck on giga.
>>    In dynamips, you can block one stream or point to some unused port.
>> 
>>    -Carlos
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>    sundeep sadhwani @ 05/04/2012 06:49 -0300 dixit:
>> 
>>        Hi all
>> 
>>        I would need your suggestions in creating an unidirectional link
>>        failure
>>        scenario.
>> 
>>        i have two devices connected back to back GSR-----4500 through
>>        fibre. I
>>        have removed the Rx of the fibre from the GSR end. At the GSR
>>        end if i
>>        disable the negotiation the link interface on GSR comes up
>>        however if i
>>        disable the negotiation on 4500 port, the interface is still down.
>> 
>>        Any suggestion of simulating this would be appreciated.
>> 
>>        Regards
>>        Sundeep
>> 
>> 
>>        Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> 
>>        ___________________________________________________________________________
>>        Subscription information may be found at:
>>        http://www.groupstudy.com/__list/CCIELab.html
>>        <http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>    --
>>    Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar <mailto:tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>>  LW7
>>    EQI  Argentina
>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Carlos G Mendioroz  <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>  LW7 EQI  Argentina
> 
> 
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> 
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Apr 05 2012 - 08:47:00 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue May 01 2012 - 08:20:45 ART