RE: OT (Hint: maybe on-topic if you need to need help)

From: Laidlaw, Patrick A. <Patrick.Laidlaw_at_wwt.com>
Date: Sun, 1 May 2011 12:58:58 -0500

I think the point is IPX was peddling some of the worst WB on the market I should know I picked them up few years ago half baked and never complete missing most of the meat and key ingredients.

Their Instructors may be good but if you're dealing with half baked material for a class how can an instructor shine when he has to back pedal on what you need to do in a scenario.

Patrick Laidlaw

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Dark Fiber
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2011 2:41 PM
To: Darby Weaver
Cc: ccie forum
Subject: Re: OT (Hint: maybe on-topic if you need to need help) 1-800-GET-NARBIK

You have failed the lab after taken Narbiks class as well as I have.
That is not saying anything bad about Narbik. He is a great instructor
and has great workbooks. He is not the panacea to the CCIE lab though
and this is another Darby advertisement post once more...

Also there are just as good instructors with IPX and INE and this is
an unfair advertisement. You have said this stuff about both there
camps as well before...

On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 1:15 AM, Darby Weaver <darby.weaver_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Here's the last segment of the Life with Narbik this week.
>
> http://darbyslogs.blogspot.com/2011/04/last-day-at-narbiks-bootcamp-1-800-get.html
>
>
> I had a thought about some of the training videos (or even classes) where
> the material/instructor, etc are having difficulty when they don't shave,
> rehearse, or cannot even troubleshoot 2-4 routers on a toplogy they created
> or at least should have worked out prior to getting in public in front of
> paying students...
>
> My advice:
>
> 1. If you are one of these instructors - GET HELP - Immediately... Call
> Narbik (1-800-GET-NARBIK) - It's not too late the class you save may be your
> own.
>
> 2. If you are a student... ask the offending training company to send you
> Narbik's class instead of theirs for a repeat of the last time they may have
> botched the job (not 100% just a little... every botch costs you
> mistakes...)...
>
>
> I'm writing this as a bit of a joke...
>
> However, I've seen videos where well-known and reputable instructors have
> absolutely no sense of professionalism (yawning, unshaven, unprepared
> sometimes), make glaring mistakes... (even in CCNA/CCNP level topics as a
> CCIE no less) and the list goes on and one and on...
>
> I've heard CCIE instructors marvel at Narbik's command retention or even
> scold the man for not using slides... they hate it.
>
> Now watch carefully as some of the pitifully clueless (who are probably
> guilty as charged) get really upset at me again... for their own
> inadequacy...
>
> If this is you... STOP - GET HELP... Call 1-800-GET-NARBIK today!
>
> Don't let another class of students leave wondering how in the hell you were
> going to resolve that problem, why you fast-forwarded the video, or worse
> never completed the thing... cause of um... "techncial difficulties"....
> etc.
>
> And if you need a class - take a moment and think about it...
>
> Talk to your instructor -ask him/her about the competition and be nice...
> ask about all of them you care to and then ask them about Narbik and what
> they are going to do better or at least... the best they can do to
> compete... they gotta eat too... and need your dime and support to pay for
> their addiction...
>
>
> Guys... you know who you are... it's your turn... I know you are out
> there... speak up - you can unicast... some CCIE instructors know the
> difference.
>
> Darby
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Darby Weaver
> Network Engineer
> http://www.darbyslogs.blogspot.com
>
> darbyweaver_at_yahoo.com
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sun May 01 2011 - 12:58:58 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jun 01 2011 - 09:01:11 ART