Re: 2600s as MPLS PEs

maybe try a different image, I went through the same process and asked a few
people about my config and what could be wrong....

On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 7:25 AM, Abdul <rslab007_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Dude.. thank you. I thought it was me. Literally been racking my brain on
> this one. Learnt alot in the process...but wow.
>
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Fabian Pucciarelli <fabiangp_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> It may be dynamips itself, I had the same problem, left the server
>> running for a few hours and when I came back it was.working.
>>
>> On Sep 23, 2010 7:01 AM, "Abdul" <rslab007_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> > All,
>> > I hate writing such generic questions, but I am stumped on this one. I
>> am
>> > trying to bring up an IPv4 PE-to-PE relationship on two 2691s running as
>> > PEs. My lab is a simply setup where I have two routers in a box
>> > (r3--r6--r5--r4--r3) where I am running OSPF as my IGP. LDP is the label
>> > swaping protocol and I have full reachability between all routers. The
>> > IPV4 iBGP setup is between routers r3 and r4. When I do the generic iBGP
>> > peering, they come right up. However, when I attempt to activate the
>> peer
>> > relationship under th address family, first off I don't see the BGP
>> peering
>> > up (under show ip bgp vpnv4 sum) on either side.
>> >
>> > I've combed over the configs and made sure my route-targets are the same
>> (on
>> > both sides), the ldp is up (yes) that rechability between the two
>> loopbacks
>> > exist (yes, under the igp between all four routers), but I can't get the
>> BGP
>> > IPv4 relationship up. I can however, get a normal iBGP relationship up
>> > between the two routers (so reachability is not an issue). Its just when
>> I
>> > attempt to activate it under the address family and look for the
>> > relationship between the two routers that I don't see it.
>> >
>> > I could throw up configs (so that everybody sees it), but I was
>> wondering is
>> > anyone has seen this issue before. I am running this setup purely on
>> > dynamips, and the simulated routers are two 2691s running Advanced
>> > Enterprises IOS 12.4(15)T13.
>> >
>> > Would appreciate is anyone has seen this issue and could give me a hint
>> into
>> > my problem.
>> >
>> > Thanks.
>> >
>> >
>> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________________________________
>> > Subscription information may be found at:
>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>

-- 
Regards,
Fabian Pucciarelli
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net