I tried the image swap. I was running advanced enterprise 12.4.25c(MD) before
I upgraded to the advanced enterprises T-Train of 12.4.15T13(MD).
On Sep 23, 2010, at 10:04 AM, Fabian Pucciarelli <fabiangp_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> maybe try a different image, I went through the same process and asked a few
people about my config and what could be wrong....
>
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 7:25 AM, Abdul <rslab007_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Dude.. thank you. I thought it was me. Literally been racking my brain on
this one. Learnt alot in the process...but wow.
>
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Fabian Pucciarelli <fabiangp_at_gmail.com>
wrote:
> It may be dynamips itself, I had the same problem, left the server running
for a few hours and when I came back it was.working.
>
> On Sep 23, 2010 7:01 AM, "Abdul" <rslab007_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > All,
> > I hate writing such generic questions, but I am stumped on this one. I am
> > trying to bring up an IPv4 PE-to-PE relationship on two 2691s running as
> > PEs. My lab is a simply setup where I have two routers in a box
> > (r3--r6--r5--r4--r3) where I am running OSPF as my IGP. LDP is the label
> > swaping protocol and I have full reachability between all routers. The
> > IPV4 iBGP setup is between routers r3 and r4. When I do the generic iBGP
> > peering, they come right up. However, when I attempt to activate the peer
> > relationship under th address family, first off I don't see the BGP
peering
> > up (under show ip bgp vpnv4 sum) on either side.
> >
> > I've combed over the configs and made sure my route-targets are the same
(on
> > both sides), the ldp is up (yes) that rechability between the two
loopbacks
> > exist (yes, under the igp between all four routers), but I can't get the
BGP
> > IPv4 relationship up. I can however, get a normal iBGP relationship up
> > between the two routers (so reachability is not an issue). Its just when
I
> > attempt to activate it under the address family and look for the
> > relationship between the two routers that I don't see it.
> >
> > I could throw up configs (so that everybody sees it), but I was wondering
is
> > anyone has seen this issue before. I am running this setup purely on
> > dynamips, and the simulated routers are two 2691s running Advanced
> > Enterprises IOS 12.4(15)T13.
> >
> > Would appreciate is anyone has seen this issue and could give me a hint
into
> > my problem.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Fabian Pucciarelli
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Sep 23 2010 - 11:16:41 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Oct 01 2010 - 05:58:05 ART