Re: OSPF router-id and net 0.0.0.0 in the LAB

From: Anthony Sequeira <asequeira_at_ine.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 20:51:38 -0500

First of all - the word ALWAYS and the CCIE lab tasks simply do not often get along - thank goodness.

Second of all - when I am a proctor and we have written a lab that does not ever mention Router ID for OSPF and a candidate asks me what to do about it - my answer - "keep it simple".

So I am afraid I cannot agree with either statement provided here.

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 10, 2010, at 9:21 PM, "Kambiz Agahian" <aussiecert_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Jack,
>
> The OSPF router-id is one of the things that they always tell you what to do
> about. If not then that's a fair proctor question.
>
> HTH
> Kambiz Agahian
>
> CCIE Instructor/Consultant
> M.Eng Telecom, CCIE# 25341, CCSI# 33326, MCSE, MCSA
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Jack Router <pan.router_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> In the LAB:
>> Is it safe to assign OSPF router id on a router even if not instructed ?
>> Also, if task just says "configure R1 in OSPF area 0", is it safe to type
>> "net 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 are 0"
>> Did you or will you use those commands ?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Aug 10 2010 - 20:51:38 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Sep 01 2010 - 11:20:52 ART