Re: Priority vs Policing

if you view it from the perspective that the priority qos feature wouldn't kick in until the interface experienced congestion, easy to remember.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ryan West <rwest_at_zyedge.com>

Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:04:53
To: Joe Astorino<jastorino_at_ipexpert.com>; Molomo<letjedilakopa_at_gmail.com>
Cc: Swap<ccie19804_at_gmail.com>; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com<ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
Subject: RE: Priority vs Policing

But only policed during congestion, I know that was confusing for me in the past.

-ryan

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Joe Astorino
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 2:20 PM
To: Molomo
Cc: Swap; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Priority vs Policing

Also I want to point out that LLQ has a built in policer as well. So,
"priority 30" means guaranteed 30kbps but also policed to 30kbps as to not
starve other queues.

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Jul 29 2009 - 19:33:24 ART