Re: Priority vs Policing

I think, it is strict priority until the configured # is hit and if no
congesiton then rest of the traffic goes into default class.

On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 3:33 PM, <ron.wilkerson_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> if you view it from the perspective that the priority qos feature wouldn't
> kick in until the interface experienced congestion, easy to remember.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ryan West <rwest_at_zyedge.com>
>
> Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:04:53
> To: Joe Astorino<jastorino_at_ipexpert.com>; Molomo<letjedilakopa_at_gmail.com>
> Cc: Swap<ccie19804_at_gmail.com>; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com<
> ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
> Subject: RE: Priority vs Policing
>
>
> But only policed during congestion, I know that was confusing for me in
> the past.
>
> -ryan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Joe Astorino
> Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 2:20 PM
> To: Molomo
> Cc: Swap; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: Priority vs Policing
>
> Also I want to point out that LLQ has a built in policer as well. So,
> "priority 30" means guaranteed 30kbps but also policed to 30kbps as to not
> starve other queues.
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Jul 29 2009 - 16:15:36 ART