Re: Priority vs Policing

From: Joe Astorino <jastorino_at_ipexpert.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:31:04 -0400

Agreed.

On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Ryan West <rwest_at_zyedge.com> wrote:

> But only policed during congestion, I know that was confusing for me in the
> past.
>
> -ryan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Joe Astorino
> Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 2:20 PM
> To: Molomo
> Cc: Swap; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: Priority vs Policing
>
> Also I want to point out that LLQ has a built in policer as well. So,
> "priority 30" means guaranteed 30kbps but also policed to 30kbps as to not
> starve other queues.
>
>
>

-- 
Regards,
Joe Astorino - CCIE #24347 R&S
Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
Cell: +1.586.212.6107
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
Mailto:  jastorino_at_ipexpert.com
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Jul 29 2009 - 15:31:04 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Aug 01 2009 - 13:10:23 ART