OT: Re: The State of the CCIE Training Industry

From: Darby Weaver <ccie.weaver_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 11:34:55 -0400

Correct sorry should have tagged it.

But if you think no longer having a generous supply of competent trainers
who are awesome and unique is not relevant, I guess that is ok too.

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sat Jul 11 2009 - 11:34:55 ART

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Darby Weaver: "Re: The State of the CCIE Training Industry"
Previous message: Gary Duncanson: "Re: The State of the CCIE Training Industry"
Next in thread: Scott Morris: "Re: OT: Re: The State of the CCIE Training Industry"
Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "Re: OT: Re: The State of the CCIE Training Industry"
Maybe reply: Hoogen: "Re: OT: Re: The State of the CCIE Training Industry"
Maybe reply: Lala Lander: "Re: OT: Re: The State of the CCIE Training Industry"
Maybe reply: Darby Weaver: "Re: OT: Re: The State of the CCIE Training Industry"
Maybe reply: Darby Weaver: "Re: OT: Re: The State of the CCIE Training Industry"
Maybe reply: Anthony Sequeira: "Re: OT: Re: The State of the CCIE Training Industry"
Maybe reply: Darby Weaver: "Re: OT: Re: The State of the CCIE Training Industry"
Maybe reply: Dark Fiber: "Re: OT: Re: The State of the CCIE Training Industry"
Maybe reply: Lala Lander: "Re: OT: Re: The State of the CCIE Training Industry"
Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "Re: OT: Re: The State of the CCIE Training Industry"
Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "Re: OT: Re: The State of the CCIE Training Industry"
Maybe reply: Dark Fiber: "Re: OT: Re: The State of the CCIE Training Industry"
Maybe reply: Evan Weston: "RE: OT: Re: The State of the CCIE Training Industry"
Maybe reply: Jonny English: "Re: OT: Re: The State of the CCIE Training Industry"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Aug 01 2009 - 13:10:22 ART