Routes are in the bgp table but in in the routing table

From: Dayaa Al Zoubi <cciecool_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 02:28:58 +0400

Hi experts

Any one can think why when i am running sh ip bgp i can see all the
desired routers and they are with with *> ,
but sh ip route bgp will show nothing ??

thanks
dayaa

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Apr 28 2009 - 02:28:58 ART

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: ron.wilkerson_at_gmail.com: "Re: Routes are in the bgp table but in in the routing table"
Previous message: Carlos G Mendioroz: "Re: Ping TOS to test QOS..."
Next in thread: ron.wilkerson_at_gmail.com: "Re: Routes are in the bgp table but in in the routing table"
Maybe reply: ron.wilkerson_at_gmail.com: "Re: Routes are in the bgp table but in in the routing table"
Maybe reply: Dayaa Al Zoubi: "Re: Routes are in the bgp table but in in the routing table"
Maybe reply: ron.wilkerson_at_gmail.com: "Re: Routes are in the bgp table but in in the routing table"
Maybe reply: Dayaa Al Zoubi: "Re: Routes are in the bgp table but in in the routing table"
Maybe reply: nAyYAR: "Re: Routes are in the bgp table but in in the routing table"
Maybe reply: Bryan Bartik: "Re: Routes are in the bgp table but in in the routing table"
Maybe reply: Larry Hadrava: "Re: Routes are in the bgp table but in in the routing table"
Maybe reply: Dufour, Andre: "RE: Routes are in the bgp table but in in the routing table"
Maybe reply: Dale Shaw: "Re: Routes are in the bgp table but in in the routing table"
Maybe reply: Dayaa Al Zoubi: "Re: Routes are in the bgp table but in in the routing table"
Maybe reply: Dayaa Al Zoubi: "Re: Routes are in the bgp table but in in the routing table"
Maybe reply: nAyYAR: "Re: Routes are in the bgp table but in in the routing table"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon May 04 2009 - 07:39:13 ART