Re: Routes are in the bgp table but in in the routing table

can not see and route in the routing table mate , so where the preferred
will come from

On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 2:55 AM, nAyYAR <nyrhh_at_hotmail.co.uk> wrote:

> could there already be a preferable route in the RT?
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "Dayaa Al Zoubi" <cciecool_at_gmail.com>
> Sent: Monday, April 27, 2009 11:46 PM
> To: <ron.wilkerson_at_gmail.com>
> Cc: "Cisco certification" <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
> Subject: Re: Routes are in the bgp table but in in the routing table
>
>
> the next hope is directly connected , it is Ebgp
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 2:41 AM, <ron.wilkerson_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Make sure the next hop is reachable.
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Dayaa Al Zoubi <cciecool_at_gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 02:28:58
>>> To: Cisco certification<ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
>>> Subject: Routes are in the bgp table but in in the routing table
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi experts
>>>
>>> Any one can think why when i am running sh ip bgp i can see all the
>>> desired routers and they are with with *> ,
>>> but sh ip route bgp will show nothing ??
>>>
>>>
>>> thanks
>>> dayaa
>>>
>>>
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Apr 28 2009 - 07:20:08 ART