Re: Routes are in the bgp table but in in the routing table

From: nAyYAR <nyrhh_at_hotmail.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 23:55:17 +0100

could there already be a preferable route in the RT?

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Dayaa Al Zoubi" <cciecool_at_gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2009 11:46 PM
To: <ron.wilkerson_at_gmail.com>
Cc: "Cisco certification" <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
Subject: Re: Routes are in the bgp table but in in the routing table

> the next hope is directly connected , it is Ebgp
>
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 2:41 AM, <ron.wilkerson_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Make sure the next hop is reachable.
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Dayaa Al Zoubi <cciecool_at_gmail.com>
>>
>> Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 02:28:58
>> To: Cisco certification<ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
>> Subject: Routes are in the bgp table but in in the routing table
>>
>>
>> Hi experts
>>
>> Any one can think why when i am running sh ip bgp i can see all the
>> desired routers and they are with with *> ,
>> but sh ip route bgp will show nothing ??
>>
>>
>> thanks
>> dayaa
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Apr 27 2009 - 23:55:17 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon May 04 2009 - 07:39:13 ART