Re: G.703 -> V.35 Compatibility

Like guys said.
First you should check the modem SP provided, be sure it is a converter from
G.703 (RJ 45 or BNC) to V35 with switched "Unframed".
Check router A's configuration with E1 unframed but not channelized.

Thanks
Keisikka

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Ranjith Samuel" <ranjith_samuel_at_hotmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 4:33 PM
To: <keisikka_at_hotmail.com>; <jerry.du_at_accenture.com>;
<ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
Subject: RE: G.703 -> V.35 Compatibility

> Hi Keisikka,
>
>
>
> Will the modem act as the converter here or do we need a separate
> convereter?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Ranjith Samuel
>
>> From: keisikka_at_hotmail.com
>> To: ranjith_samuel_at_hotmail.com; jerry.du_at_accenture.com;
> ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
>> Subject: Re: G.703 -> V.35 Compatibility
>> Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 16:09:10 +0800
>>
>> Set V35 converter to Unframed.
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> From: "Ranjith Samuel" <ranjith_samuel_at_hotmail.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 3:34 PM
>> To: <jerry.du_at_accenture.com>; <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
>> Subject: RE: G.703 -> V.35 Compatibility
>>
>> > Service provider has provided a modem on one side where I have the V35
>> > Interface. The other side there is no modem, just an RJ 45 going into
>> > my
>> > E1
>> > Card.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Since there are two service providers the blame is being thrown around
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Subject: RE: G.703 -> V.35 Compatibility
>> > Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 15:31:45 +0800
>> > From: jerry.du_at_accenture.com
>> > To: ranjith_samuel_at_hotmail.com; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Id like to advise have service provider provide this modem or it would
>> > be
>> > an
>> > argue point of circuit down.
>> >
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Jerry
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > From: Ranjith Samuel [mailto:ranjith_samuel_at_hotmail.com]
>> > Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 3:28 PM
>> > To: Du, Jerry; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
>> > Subject: RE: G.703 -> V.35 Compatibility
>> >
>> > Dear Jerry,
>> >
>> > Can the modem from the service provider take care of this conversion or
>> > do
>> > we
>> > need to buy a specific convereter?
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> >
>> > Ranjith Samuel
>> >
>> >> From: ranjith_samuel_at_hotmail.com
>> >> To: jerry.du_at_accenture.com; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
>> >> Subject: RE: G.703 -> V.35 Compatibility
>> >> Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 12:31:54 +0530
>> >>
>> >> Great. Thanx Jerry!! You're a life saver!!
>> >>
>> >> > Subject: RE: G.703 -> V.35 Compatibility
>> >> > Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 14:48:12 +0800
>> >> > From: jerry.du_at_accenture.com
>> >> > To: ranjith_samuel_at_hotmail.com; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
>> >> >
>> >> > You should have a convert at V.35 end or G.703 BNC will not able to
>> >> > connect to. The connection would like follow:
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > A router - E1 interface - G.703 - (Service provider) - G.703 BNC -
>> >> > G.703
>> >> > to V.35 converter - V.35 interface - B router
>> >> >
>> >> > |----------------- A end------------|
>> >> > |----------------------------------B
>> >> > end---------------------------------|
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Regards,
>> >> >
>> >> > Jerry
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > ________________________________
>> >> >
>> >> > From: Ranjith Samuel [mailto:ranjith_samuel_at_hotmail.com]
>> >> > Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 2:31 PM
>> >> > To: Du, Jerry; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
>> >> > Subject: RE: G.703 -> V.35 Compatibility
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks for your reply Jerry.
>> >> >
>> >> > So do we need a G.703 <-> V.35 conveter at either end for this
>> >> > circuit
>> >> > to work?? Wont G.703 interface talk to V.35 interface without the
>> >> > convereter?
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks,
>> >> >
>> >> > Ranjith Samuel
>> >> >
>> >> > > Subject: RE: G.703 -> V.35 Compatibility
>> >> > > Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 14:10:41 +0800
>> >> > > From: jerry.du_at_accenture.com
>> >> > > To: ranjith_samuel_at_hotmail.com; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Hi Ranjith,
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Yes, G.703 interface is able to work with v.35 in another end. The
>> >> > > problem you meet would be something wrong in V.35 converter, I
> guess.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Unframed setting in v.35 converter should be correct, but there
>> >> > > are
>> >> > > should some other switches in converter. You may check with your
>> >> > > ISP
>> >> > for
>> >> > > the v.35 converter setting.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > There are no special setting in router end, you would treat it as
>> >> > > a
>> >> > > normal link and apply the configuration what it should be.
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Regards,
>> >> > > Jerry
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > -----Original Message-----
>> >> > > From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On
>> >> > > Behalf
>> >> > Of
>> >> > > Ranjith Samuel
>> >> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 1:57 PM
>> >> > > To: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
>> >> > > Subject: G.703 -> V.35 Compatibility
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Dear Experts,
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > I've a query that I am sure that you will be able to help me out
>> >> > > with.
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > I have a leased line between my two of my offices each side served
> by
>> >> > a
>> >> > > different Service Provider with an interconnect between them. I
>> >> > > have
>> >> > > explained
>> >> > > the setup Below
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Point A :
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > L2 Protocol : HDLC
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Interface Type : E1 Controller G.703
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Point B :
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > L2 Protocol : HDLC
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Interface Type : E1 Controller V.35
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > The issue is I cat get both sides to comunicate. I have tried the
>> >> > > following
>> >> > > combintations in terms of framing
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > 1) Unframed
>> >> > >
>> >> > > 2) 1-31 Time slots
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > I also tried generating a network loop from the E1 Controller @
> point
>> >> > A
>> >> > > and
>> >> > > this is seen by the remote router. End to End testing has been
>> >> > > done
>> >> > > on
>> >> > > the
>> >> > > circuit and there are no errors.
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > The Symptom is that the Serial Interface comes up but line
>> >> > > protocol
>> >> > > is
>> >> > > down. I
>> >> > > tried all corrective action on the cisco website.
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > I would also like to mention that when the service provider plus
>> >> > > in
>> >> > his
>> >> > > router
>> >> > > with a G.703 interface in point B, the circuit comes up with a
>> >> > > channelised
>> >> > > E1.
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Can someone tell if both interfaces has to be of the same type for
> it
>> >> > to
>> >> > > talk
>> >> > > , or can G.703 talk to V.35 ?
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > I would reallyy appreciate it if anyone can give me a lead or clue
> as
>> >> > to
>> >> > > what
>> >> > > I might be doing wrong.
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Regards,
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Ranjith Samuel.
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > _________________________________________________________________
>> >> > > How fun is this? IMing with Windows Live Messenger just got
>> >> > > better.
>> >> > > http://www.microsoft.com/india/windows/windowslive/messenger.aspx
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
>> >> > > Subscription information may be found at:
>> >> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
>> >> > privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you
>> >> > have
>> >> > received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and
>> >> > delete
>> >> > the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
>> >> > > Subscription information may be found at:
>> >> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> >> > ________________________________
>> >> >
>> >> > Twice the fun- Share photos while you chat with Windows Live
> Messenger.
>> >> > <http://www.microsoft.com/india/windows/windowslive/messenger.aspx>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
>> >> privileged,
>> >> > proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received
>> >> > it
>> >> > in
>> >> > error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original.
>> >> > Any
>> >> > other use of the email by you is prohibited.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >> >
>> >> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
>> >> > Subscription information may be found at:
>> >> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> _________________________________________________________________
>> >> The new Windows Live Messenger. You dont want to miss this.
>> >> http://www.microsoft.com/india/windows/windowslive/messenger.aspx
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________________________________
>> >> Subscription information may be found at:
>> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Twice the fun Share photos while you chat with Windows Live Messenger.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
>> > privileged,
>> > proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it
>> > in
>> > error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original.
>> > Any
>> > other
>> > use of the email by you is prohibited.
>> > _________________________________________________________________
>> > The new Windows Live Messenger. You dont want to miss this.
>> > http://www.microsoft.com/india/windows/windowslive/messenger.aspx
>> >
>> >
>> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________________________________
>> > Subscription information may be found at:
>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> The new Windows Live Messenger. You dont want to miss this.
> http://www.microsoft.com/india/windows/windowslive/messenger.aspx
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Apr 07 2009 - 17:00:52 ART