RE: G.703 -> V.35 Compatibility

So you have all the things on hand. Just check this modem setting. Make
sure modem is in unframed and other switches in modem is correct
setting.

You would connect this modem to your router V.35 interface; put a
loopback in this modem to see the link status. If it is works fine when
put a loopback in modem, ask service provide put a loop in SP end to
test the link.

Regards,

Jerry

________________________________

From: Ranjith Samuel [mailto:ranjith_samuel_at_hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 3:35 PM
To: Du, Jerry; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: G.703 -> V.35 Compatibility

Service provider has provided a modem on one side where I have the V35
Interface. The other side there is no modem, just an RJ 45 going into my
E1 Card.

Since there are two service providers the blame is being thrown around

________________________________

Subject: RE: G.703 -> V.35 Compatibility
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 15:31:45 +0800
From: jerry.du_at_accenture.com
To: ranjith_samuel_at_hotmail.com; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com

I'd like to advise have service provider provide this modem or it would
be an argue point of circuit down.

Regards,

Jerry

________________________________

From: Ranjith Samuel [mailto:ranjith_samuel_at_hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 3:28 PM
To: Du, Jerry; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: G.703 -> V.35 Compatibility

Dear Jerry,

Can the modem from the service provider take care of this conversion or
do we need to buy a specific convereter?

Regards,

Ranjith Samuel

> From: ranjith_samuel_at_hotmail.com
> To: jerry.du_at_accenture.com; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: G.703 -> V.35 Compatibility
> Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 12:31:54 +0530
>
> Great. Thanx Jerry!! You're a life saver!!
>
> > Subject: RE: G.703 -> V.35 Compatibility
> > Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 14:48:12 +0800
> > From: jerry.du_at_accenture.com
> > To: ranjith_samuel_at_hotmail.com; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> >
> > You should have a convert at V.35 end or G.703 BNC will not able to
> > connect to. The connection would like follow:
> >
> >
> >
> > A router - E1 interface - G.703 - (Service provider) - G.703 BNC -
G.703
> > to V.35 converter - V.35 interface - B router
> >
> > |----------------- A end------------|
> > |----------------------------------B
> > end---------------------------------|
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Jerry
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> > From: Ranjith Samuel [mailto:ranjith_samuel_at_hotmail.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 2:31 PM
> > To: Du, Jerry; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> > Subject: RE: G.703 -> V.35 Compatibility
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks for your reply Jerry.
> >
> > So do we need a G.703 <-> V.35 conveter at either end for this
circuit
> > to work?? Wont G.703 interface talk to V.35 interface without the
> > convereter?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Ranjith Samuel
> >
> > > Subject: RE: G.703 -> V.35 Compatibility
> > > Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 14:10:41 +0800
> > > From: jerry.du_at_accenture.com
> > > To: ranjith_samuel_at_hotmail.com; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> > >
> > > Hi Ranjith,
> > >
> > > Yes, G.703 interface is able to work with v.35 in another end. The
> > > problem you meet would be something wrong in V.35 converter, I
guess.
> > >
> > > Unframed setting in v.35 converter should be correct, but there
are
> > > should some other switches in converter. You may check with your
ISP
> > for
> > > the v.35 converter setting.
> > >
> > > There are no special setting in router end, you would treat it as
a
> > > normal link and apply the configuration what it should be.
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Jerry
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On
Behalf
> > Of
> > > Ranjith Samuel
> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 1:57 PM
> > > To: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> > > Subject: G.703 -> V.35 Compatibility
> > >
> > > Dear Experts,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I've a query that I am sure that you will be able to help me out
with.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I have a leased line between my two of my offices each side served
by
> > a
> > > different Service Provider with an interconnect between them. I
have
> > > explained
> > > the setup Below
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Point A :
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > L2 Protocol : HDLC
> > >
> > > Interface Type : E1 Controller G.703
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Point B :
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > L2 Protocol : HDLC
> > >
> > > Interface Type : E1 Controller V.35
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The issue is I cat get both sides to comunicate. I have tried the
> > > following
> > > combintations in terms of framing
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 1) Unframed
> > >
> > > 2) 1-31 Time slots
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I also tried generating a network loop from the E1 Controller @
point
> > A
> > > and
> > > this is seen by the remote router. End to End testing has been
done on
> > > the
> > > circuit and there are no errors.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The Symptom is that the Serial Interface comes up but line
protocol is
> > > down. I
> > > tried all corrective action on the cisco website.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I would also like to mention that when the service provider plus
in
> > his
> > > router
> > > with a G.703 interface in point B, the circuit comes up with a
> > > channelised
> > > E1.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Can someone tell if both interfaces has to be of the same type for
it
> > to
> > > talk
> > > , or can G.703 talk to V.35 ?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I would reallyy appreciate it if anyone can give me a lead or clue
as
> > to
> > > what
> > > I might be doing wrong.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Ranjith Samuel.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > How fun is this? IMing with Windows Live Messenger just got
better.
> > > http://www.microsoft.com/india/windows/windowslive/messenger.aspx
> > >
> > >
> > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> > >
> > >
> >
Received on Tue Apr 07 2009 - 16:49:39 ART