From: Igor M. (imanassypov@rogers.com)
Date: Sun Aug 24 2008 - 09:18:04 ART
If you decided to go with Auto-RP, how would you designate primary/backup RP pair for a particular group if auto-rp does not carry priority?
----------------------
I.M., M.Eng. P.Eng.
Network Architect
CI Investments
----------------------
--- On Sun, 8/24/08, Mujeeb Sarwar <mujeebsarwar@gmail.com> wrote:
From: Mujeeb Sarwar <mujeebsarwar@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: BSR : Priorities
To: "Narbik Kocharians" <narbikk@gmail.com>
Cc: "GAURAV MADAN" <gauravmadan1177@gmail.com>, "Cisco certification" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Received: Sunday, August 24, 2008, 3:36 AM
Even in Auto-RP you will get info for all possible RPs on mapping agent,
from which mapping agent will elect the RP and advertise to other routers.
Regards,
Mujeeb
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 7:43 PM, Narbik Kocharians
<narbikk@gmail.com>wrote:
> Remember, unlike Auto-RP, with BSR, the BSR router does not elect an RP
for
> you, the BSR creates a list that includes all the RPs (RP-Set) and that is
> advertised to the other routers, and its the routers that elect an RP and
> NOT the BSR.
>
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 6:43 AM, GAURAV MADAN
<gauravmadan1177@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Any comments on this ?
> >
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: GAURAV MADAN <gauravmadan1177@gmail.com>
> > Date: Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 9:04 PM
> > Subject: BSR : Priorities
> > To: Cisco certification <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >
> >
> > HI All
> >
> > My requirement says that R4 should be RP for 224.0.0.0/5 .. If R4
> > fails .. R5 should assume role of RP .
> >
> > I did it as follows :
> >
> > Rack1R4(config)# ip pim rp-candidate loop 0 group-list 10 priority 80
> >
> > Rack1R5(config)# ip pim rp-candidate loop 0 group-list 10 priority 90
> >
> > At mapping agent .. I see the following :
> >
> > Rack1R3#sh ip pim rp mapp
> > PIM Group-to-RP Mappings
> > This system is the Bootstrap Router (v2)
> >
> > Group(s) 224.0.0.0/5
> > RP 150.1.4.4 (?), v2
> > Info source: 154.1.0.4 (?), via bootstrap, priority 80, holdtime
150
> > Uptime: 00:03:53, expires: 00:01:32
> > RP 150.1.5.5 (?), v2
> > Info source: 154.1.0.5 (?), via bootstrap, priority 90, holdtime
150
> > Uptime: 00:03:44, expires: 00:01:41
> > Rack1R3#
> >
> > Is it expected that I see both of candidate RPs ..
> > My take is that one which is active is only shown up .. Please
correct
> > me if I am wrong in my understanding .
> >
> > Thnx
> > Gaurav Madan.
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Sep 01 2008 - 08:15:32 ART