From: Mujeeb Sarwar (mujeebsarwar@gmail.com)
Date: Sun Aug 24 2008 - 11:00:06 ART
By using higher ip address for primary. Let say R1 having loopback 1 with
ip address 10.10.10.10 and R2 having loopback 1 with ip address
1.1.1.1so in this case R1 will be the primary and R2 will be backup.
Regards,
Mujeeb
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Igor M. <imanassypov@rogers.com> wrote:
> If you decided to go with Auto-RP, how would you designate primary/backup
> RP pair for a particular group if auto-rp does not carry priority?
>
> ----------------------
> I.M., M.Eng. P.Eng.
> Network Architect
> CI Investments
> ----------------------
>
> --- On *Sun, 8/24/08, Mujeeb Sarwar <mujeebsarwar@gmail.com>* wrote:
>
> From: Mujeeb Sarwar <mujeebsarwar@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: BSR : Priorities
> To: "Narbik Kocharians" <narbikk@gmail.com>
> Cc: "GAURAV MADAN" <gauravmadan1177@gmail.com>, "Cisco certification" <
> ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Received: Sunday, August 24, 2008, 3:36 AM
>
>
> Even in Auto-RP you will get info for all possible RPs on mapping agent,
> from which mapping agent will elect the RP and advertise to other routers.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Mujeeb
>
> On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 7:43 PM, Narbik Kocharians
> <narbikk@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > Remember, unlike Auto-RP, with BSR, the BSR router does not elect an RP
> for
> > you, the BSR creates a list that includes all the RPs (RP-Set) and
> that is
> > advertised to the other routers, and its the routers that elect an RP and
> > NOT the BSR.
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 6:43 AM, GAURAV MADAN
> <gauravmadan1177@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > Any comments on this ?
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > > From: GAURAV MADAN <gauravmadan1177@gmail.com>
> > > Date: Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 9:04 PM
> > > Subject: BSR : Priorities
> > > To: Cisco certification <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > >
> > >
> > > HI All
> > >
> > > My requirement says that R4 should be RP for 224.0.0.0/5 .. If R4
> > > fails .. R5 should assume role of RP .
> > >
> > > I did it as follows :
> > >
> > > Rack1R4(config)# ip pim rp-candidate loop 0 group-list 10 priority 80
> > >
> > > Rack1R5(config)# ip pim rp-candidate
> loop 0 group-list 10 priority 90
> > >
> > > At mapping agent .. I see the following :
> > >
> > > Rack1R3#sh ip pim rp mapp
> > > PIM Group-to-RP Mappings
> > > This system is the Bootstrap Router (v2)
> > >
> > > Group(s) 224.0.0.0/5
> > > RP 150.1.4.4 (?), v2
> > > Info source: 154.1.0.4 (?), via bootstrap, priority 80, holdtime
> 150
> > > Uptime: 00:03:53, expires: 00:01:32
> > > RP 150.1.5.5 (?), v2
> > > Info source: 154.1.0.5 (?), via bootstrap, priority 90, holdtime
> 150
> > > Uptime: 00:03:44, expires: 00:01:41
> > > Rack1R3#
> > >
> > > Is it expected that I see both of candidate RPs ..
> > > My take is that one which is active is only shown up .. Please
> correct
> > > me if I am wrong in my understanding .
> > >
> > > Thnx
> > > Gaurav Madan.
> > >
> >
> >
> > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> > >
> > >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Narbik Kocharians
> > CCSI#30832, CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security)
> > www.MicronicsTraining
> > www.Net-Workbooks.com
> > Sr. Technical Instructor
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at
> http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Sep 01 2008 - 08:15:32 ART