From: Cielieska Nathan (ncielieska@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Jan 10 2008 - 12:25:03 ARST
Great comments all... Regards.
The BGP is a situation that i did not think of. For now i'll remain
keeping it stupid simple and not changing things i'm not supposed to.
Thanks for the feedback guys,
Nate
On Jan 10, 2008, at 7:48 AM, Luan Nguyen wrote:
> With IE, they only use one loopback, so setting the routerID or
> not, doesn't really make a different. But with NMC, they use a lot
> of loopbacks, setting the routerID really helps you out.
> There is a problem with BGP sync. Say you have OSPF as IGP and
> need to redistribute into BGP, then your OSPF rouer ID of the one
> advertising the routes need to match the router ID of BGP. If not,
> sync will prevent the BGP from making that the best routes. I've
> seen a scenario, from NMC, i think, where you have to use the
> router ID of OSPF in one router as the router ID of BGP in another
> one. Only one I've ever came across.
>
> -lmn
>
> On Jan 9, 2008 5:00 PM, Cielieska Nathan <ncielieska@gmail.com> wrote:
> All,
> In OSPF, DR/BDR Election removed.. is there ever a reason not to
> manipulate the router-id? I am moving through Labs but i find it
> cleaner to change the router-id on every router i touch to make
> things mentally "cleaner". I can also see it buying you some time on
> the Big Lab especially with Virtual Links.
>
> Again, if you account for the DR/BDR Election, is there a reason to
> not chronically change the router-id's?
>
> Regards,
> Nate
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Feb 01 2008 - 10:37:58 ARST