Router-id Harmful?

From: Cielieska Nathan (ncielieska@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Jan 09 2008 - 20:00:43 ARST

Next message: John: "re:dot1q tunneling"
Previous message: John: "Dot1q tunneling"
Next in thread: Joseph Brunner: "RE: Router-id Harmful?"
Maybe reply: Joseph Brunner: "RE: Router-id Harmful?"
Maybe reply: Felix Nkansah: "Re: Router-id Harmful?"
Maybe reply: Banks, Ethan: "RE: Router-id Harmful?"
Maybe reply: Luan Nguyen: "Re: Router-id Harmful?"
Maybe reply: Cielieska Nathan: "Re: Router-id Harmful?"
Maybe reply: Darby Weaver: "Re: Router-id Harmful?"
Maybe reply: Tarun Pahuja: "Re: Router-id Harmful?"
Maybe reply: Scott Vermillion: "RE: Router-id Harmful?"
Maybe reply: Jonny English: "Re: Router-id Harmful?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

All,
In OSPF, DR/BDR Election removed.. is there ever a reason not to
manipulate the router-id? I am moving through Labs but i find it
cleaner to change the router-id on every router i touch to make
things mentally "cleaner". I can also see it buying you some time on
the Big Lab especially with Virtual Links.

Again, if you account for the DR/BDR Election, is there a reason to
not chronically change the router-id's?

Regards,
Nate

Next message: John: "re:dot1q tunneling"
Previous message: John: "Dot1q tunneling"
Next in thread: Joseph Brunner: "RE: Router-id Harmful?"
Maybe reply: Joseph Brunner: "RE: Router-id Harmful?"
Maybe reply: Felix Nkansah: "Re: Router-id Harmful?"
Maybe reply: Banks, Ethan: "RE: Router-id Harmful?"
Maybe reply: Luan Nguyen: "Re: Router-id Harmful?"
Maybe reply: Cielieska Nathan: "Re: Router-id Harmful?"
Maybe reply: Darby Weaver: "Re: Router-id Harmful?"
Maybe reply: Tarun Pahuja: "Re: Router-id Harmful?"
Maybe reply: Scott Vermillion: "RE: Router-id Harmful?"
Maybe reply: Jonny English: "Re: Router-id Harmful?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Feb 01 2008 - 10:37:58 ARST