NTP: server vs. peer

From: hadek.el-ayachi@nsn.com
Date: Wed Oct 31 2007 - 09:20:19 ART

Next message: shiran guez: "Re: IE Lab 7 Task 1.4 L2 Tunnel"
Previous message: hadek.el-ayachi@nsn.com: "RE: FW: Auto-RP : Multiple C-RPs for the same group"
Next in thread: shiran guez: "Re: NTP: server vs. peer"
Maybe reply: shiran guez: "Re: NTP: server vs. peer"
Maybe reply: hadek.el-ayachi@nsn.com: "RE: NTP: server vs. peer"
Maybe reply: shiran guez: "Re: NTP: server vs. peer"
Maybe reply: hadek.el-ayachi@nsn.com: "RE: NTP: server vs. peer"
Maybe reply: Uchil Perera: "RE: NTP: server vs. peer"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi all,
If I am asked to configure R6 to have its clock from BB1 then failover
and get time from R3 if BB1 is down. Also, R3 get time from BB3 and fail
over to R6 in case BB3 is down.
What is correct:

1-
R6:
Ntp server BB1 prefer
Ntp server R3

R3:
Ntp server BB3 prefer
Ntp server R6

2-
R6:
Ntp server BB1
Ntp peer R3

R3:
Ntp server BB3
Ntp peer R6

Thanks for feedback

Next message: shiran guez: "Re: IE Lab 7 Task 1.4 L2 Tunnel"
Previous message: hadek.el-ayachi@nsn.com: "RE: FW: Auto-RP : Multiple C-RPs for the same group"
Next in thread: shiran guez: "Re: NTP: server vs. peer"
Maybe reply: shiran guez: "Re: NTP: server vs. peer"
Maybe reply: hadek.el-ayachi@nsn.com: "RE: NTP: server vs. peer"
Maybe reply: shiran guez: "Re: NTP: server vs. peer"
Maybe reply: hadek.el-ayachi@nsn.com: "RE: NTP: server vs. peer"
Maybe reply: Uchil Perera: "RE: NTP: server vs. peer"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Nov 16 2007 - 13:11:19 ART