From: Donghai Zhang (zdh1207@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Oct 22 2007 - 00:30:11 ART
Dear,
No redistribution occur if two different routing protocol processes are run
on the same router.So you have to activate eirgrp 10 on R2 or activate eigrp
100 on R1, otherwide the redistribution would not work.
2007/10/22, raul raul <juvenn@hotmail.com>:
>
> you need to include metric for eigrp redistribution
>
> example
>
> eigrp 10
> redistribute eigrp 100 subnet metric 1000 100 255 1 1500
> > From: scott_ccie_list@it-ag.com> To: Cecil.Wilson@flextronics.com;
> joe@affirmedsystems.com; gary.duncanson@googlemail.com;
> anthony.sequeira@thomson.com> CC: ccielab@groupstudy.com> Subject: RE:
> Help with Eigrp redistribution> Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 15:14:43 -0600> > Hey
> Cecil,> > You have EIGRP enabled via 'net 4.4.100.1 0.0.0.0' on R1 and the
> same for> the .2 on R2. But EIGRP requires that the AS number be common
> between the> two routers; it is not simply a process ID, such as the case w/
> OSPF. So> presumably you aren't seeing an adjacency coming up between these
> two> routers, no?> > Regards,> > Scott> > -----Original Message-----> From:
> nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of> Cecil
> Wilson> Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2007 2:54 PM> To: Joseph Brunner; Gary
> Duncanson; anthony.sequeira@thomson.com> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Subject: Help with Eigrp redistribution> > Hello GS> I am having problems
> redistrinte a subnet from eigrp into the routing> t!
> able example> > R1 > Router eigrp 10> Red eigrp 100 > Network 1.1.1.1
> 0.0.0.0 > Net 150.1.1.1 0.0.0.0> Net 4.4.100.1 0.0.0.0 > > R2> Router
> eigrp 100> Red eigrp 10> Net 2.2.2.2 0.0.0.0> Net 4.4.100.2 0.0.0.0> > Sho
> ip ro ? No network 150.1.1.0> I played with the metric but can not get to
> see the 150.1.1.0 network on> the other routers?> Can someone tell me what
> I maybe missing, how to get this network to> redistribute?> Thanks> > >
> Cecil G. Wilson > IT Network Services > Office: (901) 215-2710 > Cell: (901)
> 601-6201 > VoIP 104-2710> FLEX Logistics> cecil.wilson@flextronics.com > >
> -----Original Message-----> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:
> nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of> Joseph Brunner> Sent: Saturday,
> October 20, 2007 10:28 AM> To: 'Gary Duncanson';
> anthony.sequeira@thomson.com> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com> Subject: RE:
> interesting> > Another thing guys,> > Many job Interviews I have been asked
> what rfc's I have read lately?> What are my favorites?> > Cool huh?> > !
> -----Original Message-----> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailt!
> o:nobody
>
> @groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of> Gary Duncanson> Sent: Saturday, October 20,
> 2007 11:19 AM> To: anthony.sequeira@thomson.com> Cc:
> ccielab@groupstudy.com> Subject: Re: interesting> > Anthony,> > That's
> very true.> > Gary> ----- Original Message -----> From: <
> anthony.sequeira@thomson.com>> To: <shiranp3@gmail.com>; <
> ccielab@groupstudy.com>> Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2007 3:05 PM>
> Subject: RE: interesting> > > > That is awesome! > > > > It is amazing how
> many of the RFCs are critical to read. For the CCIE> > Written, I find that
> many of the questions come directly from these> > documents. I also find
> that much of the "documentation" you see out> > there these days is almost a
> cut and paste from the original RFC. > > > > Anthony J Sequeira> > #15626> >
> Don't Cheat Yourself - Learn> >
> http://www.netmasterclass.com/CCIE/Self-Paced-Program/Written/> > > >
> -----Original Message-----> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:
> nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf> Of> > shiran guez> > Sent: S!
> aturday, October 20, 2007 9:25 AM> > To: Cisco certification> > Subject:
> interesting> > > > Today I went trough RFC 2281 Cisco Hot standby router
> protocol (HSRP)> > > > and what was interesting is that although it is Cisco
> HSRP, it was> > written> > by 2 Juniper and 2 Cisco People.> > I think it
> should be called JUCI HSRP :-)> > > > -- > > Shiran Guez> > MCSE CCNP NCE1>
> > http://cciep3.blogspot.com> > http://www.linkedin.com/in/cciep3> > > >>
> _______________________________________________________________________> >
> Subscription information may be found at: > >
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html> > > >>
> _______________________________________________________________________> >
> Subscription information may be found at: > >
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html> >
> _______________________________________________________________________>
> Subscription information may be found at: >
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html> >
> ____________________________________!
> ___________________________________> Subscription information !
> may be f
>
> ound at: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html> > Legal
> Disclaimer:> The information contained in this message may be privileged
> and> confidential. It is intended to be read only by the individual or
> entity to> whom it is addressed or by their designee. If the reader of this
> message is> not the intended recipient, you are on notice that any
> distribution of this> message, in any form, is strictly prohibited. If you
> have received this> message in error, please immediately notify the sender
> and delete or destroy> any copy of this message> >
> _______________________________________________________________________>
> Subscription information may be found at: >
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html> >
> _______________________________________________________________________>
> Subscription information may be found at: >
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> _________________________________________________________________
> Express yourself with the latest Windows Live Messenger! Get it free
> today!
> http://www.get.live.com/wl/all
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Nov 16 2007 - 13:11:17 ART