From: raul raul (juvenn@hotmail.com)
Date: Sat Sep 29 2007 - 22:08:16 ART
any other method beside using this sla tools ?
> From: joe@affirmedsystems.com> To: dpocoroba@gmail.com> CC: ccielab@groupstudy.com> Subject: RE: what is wrong with SLA> Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 20:40:52 -0400> > It works guys that way...> > Thanks...> > Nice moves, IE> > -----Original Message-----> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of> Derek Pocoroba> Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2007 2:16 PM> To: Joseph Brunner> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com> Subject: Re: what is wrong with SLA> > Joe,> > Try adding the keyword "control disable"> > ip sla monitor 1> type udpEcho dest-ipaddr 10.10.100.2 dest-port 2000 source-ipaddr> 10.10.100.11> source-port 2000 control disable> timeout 6> frequency 6> ip sla monitor schedule 1 life forever start-time now> > R1#deb ip pack de> IP packet debugging is on (detailed)> R1#u all> *Mar 1 00:07:00.327: IP: tableid=0, s=10.10.100.11 (local),> d=10.10.100.2(Ethe> rnet0/0), routed via FIB> *Mar 1 00:07:00.331: IP: s=10.10.100.11 (local),> d=10.10.100.2(Ethernet0/0),!
l> en 44, sending> *Mar 1 00:07:00.335: UDP src=2000, dst=2000> R1#u all> *Mar 1 00:07:06.327: IP: tableid=0, s=10.10.100.11 (local),> d=10.10.100.2(Ethe> rnet0/0), routed via FIB> *Mar 1 00:07:06.331: IP: s=10.10.100.11 (local),> d=10.10.100.2(Ethernet0/0), l> en 44, sending> *Mar 1 00:07:06.335: UDP src=2000, dst=2000> > HTH> > > On 9/29/07, Joseph Brunner <joe@affirmedsystems.com> wrote:> >> > Does anyone else think IP SLA is a turd? (look at what's wrong with this> > picture)> >> >> >> > ip sla monitor 1> >> > type udpEcho dest-ipaddr 1.1.16.22 dest-port 2000 source-ipaddr 1.1.16.6> > source-port 2000> >> > timeout 6> >> > frequency 2> >> > ip sla monitor schedule 1 life forever start-time now> >> >> >> > *Sep 29 08:56:08.959: IP: tableid=0, s=1.1.16.6 (local), d=1.1.16.22> > (GigabitEthernet0/0), routed via RIB> >> > *Sep 29 08:56:08.959: IP: s=1.1.16.6 (local), d=1.1.16.22> > (GigabitEthernet0/0), len 80, sending> >> > *Sep 29 08:56:08.959: UDP src=2000, dst=1967> >>!
> *Sep 29 08:56:08.959: IP: tableid=0, s=1.1.16.6 (GigabitEth!
ernet0/0
),> > d=1.1.16.22 (GigabitEthernet0/0), routed via RIB> >> > *Sep 29 08:56:08.959: IP: s=1.1.16.6 (GigabitEthernet0/0), d=1.1.16.22> > (GigabitEthernet0/0), len 80, rcvd 3> >> > *Sep 29 08:56:08.959: UDP src=2000, dst=1967> >> >> >> >> >> > I think Cisco's R&D is choking on Watermelon seeds in the Watermelon juice> > in San Jose.> >> > _______________________________________________________________________> > Subscription information may be found at:> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html> >> > > > -- > Derek Pocoroba> CCIE #18559> > _______________________________________________________________________> Subscription information may be found at: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html> > _______________________________________________________________________> Subscription information may be found at: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 06 2007 - 12:01:17 ART