From: Joseph Brunner (joe@affirmedsystems.com)
Date: Sat Sep 29 2007 - 14:26:56 ART
Does anyone else think IP SLA is a turd? (look at what's wrong with this
picture)
ip sla monitor 1
type udpEcho dest-ipaddr 1.1.16.22 dest-port 2000 source-ipaddr 1.1.16.6
source-port 2000
timeout 6
frequency 2
ip sla monitor schedule 1 life forever start-time now
*Sep 29 08:56:08.959: IP: tableid=0, s=1.1.16.6 (local), d=1.1.16.22
(GigabitEthernet0/0), routed via RIB
*Sep 29 08:56:08.959: IP: s=1.1.16.6 (local), d=1.1.16.22
(GigabitEthernet0/0), len 80, sending
*Sep 29 08:56:08.959: UDP src=2000, dst=1967
*Sep 29 08:56:08.959: IP: tableid=0, s=1.1.16.6 (GigabitEthernet0/0),
d=1.1.16.22 (GigabitEthernet0/0), routed via RIB
*Sep 29 08:56:08.959: IP: s=1.1.16.6 (GigabitEthernet0/0), d=1.1.16.22
(GigabitEthernet0/0), len 80, rcvd 3
*Sep 29 08:56:08.959: UDP src=2000, dst=1967
I think Cisco's R&D is choking on Watermelon seeds in the Watermelon juice
in San Jose.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 06 2007 - 12:01:16 ART