From: WorkerBee (ciscobee@gmail.com)
Date: Fri Jun 29 2007 - 11:40:55 ART
To further confirmed your BSR election if you still have doubt, run this..
show ip pim bsr-router
You can't be wrong with so many different methods of verification. ;)
On 6/29/07, louis john <west_coast@inbox.com> wrote:
> But in show ip pim rp mapping , nothing more than priorities, I want to see something such as elected , preferred, etc.
>
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ivan@iip.net
> > Sent: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 17:48:52 +0400
> > To: west_coast@inbox.com
> > Subject: Re: How to verify the BSR Election ?
> >
> > On Friday 29 June 2007 17:42, louis john wrote:
> >> Ivan, thanks for replying, Now I have two questions :
> >>
> >>
> >> 1 - How do you interpret the (1) and (2) ? if I replaced the priority
> >> the
> >
> > I think it mean "RP number one and RP number two". No more no less.
> >
> >> following result will appear :
> >>
> >>
> >> PIM-BSR(0): RP-set for 224.0.0.0/4
> >>
> >> PIM-BSR(0): RP(1) 130.100.2.2, holdtime 119 sec priority 100
> >> PIM-BSR(0): RP(2) 130.100.5.5, holdtime 11 sec priority 200
> >>
> >>
> >> 2 - How can I very on any of those routers who is the preferred ?
> >
> > sh ip pim rp mapping
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Please do not refer me to the lower priority, I want a proof via debug
> >> or
> >> show command.
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: ivan@iip.net
> >>> Sent: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 17:34:36 +0400
> >>> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com, west_coast@inbox.com
> >>> Subject: Re: How to verify the BSR Election ?
> >>>
> >>> BSR doesn't elect RP. BSR only spread information about RP across
> >>> multicast
> >>> domain. Each router decide wich RP it will be use. Lower priority more
> >>> prefer.
> >>>
> >>> On Friday 29 June 2007 17:22, louis john wrote:
> >>>> Hi Group : I have collected the following debug out of the BSR router
> >>>> ,
> >>>> please tell me if this way of verification is valid to know who was
> >>>> elected
> >>>> as RP
> >>>>
> >>>> debug ip pim bsr
> >>>>
> >>>> *Mar 1 01:25:30.175: PIM-BSR(0): RP-set for 224.0.0.0/4
> >>>> *Mar 1 01:25:30.179: PIM-BSR(0): RP(1) 130.100.5.5, holdtime 11 sec
> >>>> priority 100 *Mar 1 01:25:30.179: PIM-BSR(0): RP(2) 130.100.2.2,
> >>>> holdtime 119 sec priority 200
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> in the above debug, can we say R5 was elected because of two things :
> >>>> ?
> >>>>
> >>>> 1 - Lower Priority
> >>>> 2 - RP(1) is shown as the first RP in the RP-set.
> >>>>
> >>>> ____________________________________________________________
> >>>> FREE ONLINE PHOTOSHARING - Share your photos online with your friends
> >>>> and
> >>>> family! Visit http://www.inbox.com/photosharing to find out more!
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________________________________
> >>>> Subscription information may be found at:
> >>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> KEEP SPYWARE OFF YOUR COMPUTER - Protect your computer with Spyware Terminator!
> Visit http://www.spywareterminator.com/install and find out more!
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Jul 01 2007 - 17:24:52 ART