RIP and OSPF

From: Bhaskar Sivanesan (bas_bharath@yahoo.com)
Date: Wed May 16 2007 - 18:58:56 ART

• Next message: Prash Kumar: "Re: RIP and OSPF"
• Previous message: Mounir Mohamed: "Re: Frame-Relay point-to-point, Frame-Relay point-to-multipoint"
• Next in thread: Prash Kumar: "Re: RIP and OSPF"
• Maybe reply: Prash Kumar: "Re: RIP and OSPF"
• Maybe reply: Brian Dennis: "Re: RIP and OSPF"
• Maybe reply: Mounir Mohamed: "Re: RIP and OSPF"
• Maybe reply: Brian Dennis: "Re: RIP and OSPF"
• Maybe reply: Bhaskar Sivanesan: "Re: RIP and OSPF"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi Group

Assume, we have a router which has RIP and OSPF enabled and OSPF is redistributing the RIP routes into it. Now once the redistribution happens, we now have the prefix in both the routing protocols.

Since OSPF has a better AD, will the RIP entry in the routing table be replaced with the OSPF entry? I know this does not happen, but wanted to know which feature prevents this from happening.

For EIGRp the external AD is 170. Similarly is there anything for OSPF?

Thanks
Bhaskar

• Next message: Prash Kumar: "Re: RIP and OSPF"
• Previous message: Mounir Mohamed: "Re: Frame-Relay point-to-point, Frame-Relay point-to-multipoint"
• Next in thread: Prash Kumar: "Re: RIP and OSPF"
• Maybe reply: Prash Kumar: "Re: RIP and OSPF"
• Maybe reply: Brian Dennis: "Re: RIP and OSPF"
• Maybe reply: Mounir Mohamed: "Re: RIP and OSPF"
• Maybe reply: Brian Dennis: "Re: RIP and OSPF"
• Maybe reply: Bhaskar Sivanesan: "Re: RIP and OSPF"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 01 2007 - 06:55:21 ART