From: Brian Dennis (bdennis@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Wed May 16 2007 - 21:49:38 ART
Have you tried to lab this up and verify it? Remember that the question is
in regards to what happens on the router doing redistribution itself.
--Brian Dennis, CCIE4 #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/SP) bdennis@internetworkexpert.com Internetwork Expert, Inc. http://www.InternetworkExpert.com Toll Free: 877-224-8987 Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada)
On 5/16/07 5:30 PM, "Mounir Mohamed" <mounir.mohamed@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear, > > Yes OSPF routes will replace exist RIP routes, you can use route-map > attached to the redistribute command to effect the AD of redistributed > routes to keep RIP routes exist and prevent routing loops. > > Best Regards, > Mounir Mohamed > > > On 5/17/07, Bhaskar Sivanesan <bas_bharath@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Group >> >> Assume, we have a router which has RIP and OSPF enabled and OSPF is >> redistributing the RIP routes into it. Now once the redistribution happens, >> we now have the prefix in both the routing protocols. >> >> Since OSPF has a better AD, will the RIP entry in the routing table be >> replaced with the OSPF entry? I know this does not happen, but wanted to >> know which feature prevents this from happening. >> >> For EIGRp the external AD is 170. Similarly is there anything for OSPF? >> >> Thanks >> Bhaskar >> >> >> >> >> _____________________________________________________________________________ >> _______ >> Sucker-punch spam with award-winning protection. >> Try the free Yahoo! Mail Beta. >> http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/features_spam.html >> >> _______________________________________________________________________ >> Subscription information may be found at: >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 01 2007 - 06:55:21 ART